Scalia: "sexual orgies eliminate tension and ought to be encouraged"

What a lewd, crude remark!










Discussion of the substance of his remarks is here >

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x674798

fucked by a bunch of Republicans.

Now i get it.

If so, can we get an audit of just what channels we are buying for them> ;)

:)

having been fortunate enough to have been in one or two. I felt no tension. ;)

And why wasn't I invited ?!?!?!

:rofl:

it depends on how many people constitute an orgy and on what the definition of what the word "is" is.

More than 4 people

3= Threesome
4=Foursome
5=Orgy

imho :evilgrin:

does the group of 5 or more have to include 2 men and 2 women or does me and 4 women count as an orgy?

not there's anything wrong with that but....

or·gy ( P ) Pronunciation Key (ôrj)
n. pl. or·gies
1.A revel involving unrestrained indulgence, especially sexual activity.
2.Uncontrolled or immoderate indulgence in an activity: an orgy of spending. See Synonyms at binge.
3.A secret rite in the cults of ancient Greek or Roman deities, typically involving frenzied singing, dancing, drinking, and sexual activity.

was there ouzo involved? :rofl:

:toast:

And everybody walks away satisfied and OK with themselves and each other, it's an orgy. Course... it's more likely to be a fantasy than an orgy, but that's because doing it well is so rare.

According to the books I've studied.

:shrug:

I think the lewd and crude comes into play in picturing Scalia being at said event ;)

between Repub and Dem beliefs in government, rights and the Constitution. He's saying that judges shouldn't decide the morality of sexual issues, but he's saying that it's okay to legislate and restrict them nonetheless. A Dem would say that neither a judge nor a legislator should decide someone else's morality, and it is the role of the courts to protect the people from legislators who try to do so.

Clarence Thomas: "Oh yes. You can bet your Long Dong on it. As an expert on pubic hairs on Coke cans, I concur"

if angelina jolie said that, ok. but not that slimy guy.

Or worse!

no wonder I'm so tense

Didn't they say that it would negatively impact the GOP (Hard) CORE Hierarchy

and I believe Scalia once refused to answer a question about whether he has participated in sodomy with his wife.

http://www.lawschool.com/scaliasex.htm


Scalia Discusses Orgies and Sex

(10-01) 12:40 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's recent speeches have ventured into some surprising territory, with the staunchly conservative father of nine joking about sexual orgies.

Scalia is known for a biting humor and is entertaining on the talk circuit and on the bench during the court's argument sessions.

He raised some eyebrows with a speech this week at Harvard University, however, with a comment about the number of people needed for group sex and the jest that "sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged."

He made a similar remark in a speech Sept. 20 in Washington, to chuckles from the crowd at the conservative Ethics and Public Policy Center, while making the point that judges can have personal moral judgments. It is not judges' role to impose them on citizens, he said.

and ought to be encouraged."

The Roman Empire did last a long time.

I do have one thing to say about Scalia though. I will see the guest list before I go to the next orgy!

wrong view of the role of the courts and the legislature. What was it Tony was doing on that trip with DeadEye?

Unfortunately, Tony doesn't have the same respect for me and my personal affairs.

Seriously, how do the fundies take stuff like this? What if Bill Clinton said it? Or Sandra Day O'Connor? Or even Clarence Thomas?

from the Vatican? None of our people ADVOCATE immorality, yet this Nuremberg blue plate Catholic special would support the punishment of selective people for selective sins with the Vatican's approval and make exceptions for Roman style decadence of the lowest character.

But to get to the point, this hugely suggests, and even boasts of personal experience and current behavior by himself and some circle jerk of friends. You don't talk like this unless you are either trying to bluff out your secret life a la Senator "Monkey Business" Hart or are just too personally immoral to see anything wrong with one's personal preferences. Has no one dared ask of his personal experience? Come on!

Maybe it would be safer if Bill Bennett and he were in a therapy group because with their different proclivities it wouldn't devolve into a sex therapy session.

Scalia: "I'll bet you'll like this better than gambling."

Bennett: "You're on, your honor!"

GENIUS, I tell ya!

MORE ORGIES!

but when he's right...he's right...lol Just as long as he is not involved in the orgy :puke:

It does quote him as "personally" believing.

With absolutely NO background checks??

yuck!

double yuck!

:)

When you really need them?

wasn't too serious--hopeful, maybe

along with his Cialis for his 36-hour orgies :evilgrin:

It's immoral to prohibit the behavior. Strawman alert! Let the individual be responsible for his morality.

--IMM

Twisty logic.

Hekate

And catching Scalia.....


Yeeeshhhh!!!!!

"Scalia" and "sexual orgies," both mentioned together!!! :puke: