Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There's one reason that pushing Censure is a bad idea...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:41 PM
Original message
There's one reason that pushing Censure is a bad idea...
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 03:41 PM by Rosco T.
.. win or lose, the 'thugs will use it to energize the mindless drone... er.. I mean their base for '06.

SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING NOW! VOTE US BACK IN OR THE FILTHY GODLESS DEMS WILL IMPEACH OUR LORD SHRUBYA!

I still favor censure/impeachment... but I think we should have kept the power dry till after November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. I say let the chips fall where they may...
Standing back and looking for the "right" opportunity to strike back hasn't really worked too well for our Dem "representatives", has it? I mean, did stepping aside and hoping for the best work well in other developing fascist states?

Censure-->Impeach-->Convict!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree totally...
Bush is out to kill us all. He's gotta go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sure that's what they're saying, but if the majority of voters
believe Shrub broke the law, they just might be working against themselves! Them Godless Dems might do exactly what the people want!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Running away in fear is sure to keep Dem "power dry", long after November
In typing haste, there is truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe Feingold was thinking of the elections this fall
I mean, maybe he saw this as a way to counteract moves made by Congressional repubs as they try to distance themselves from the WH. Cause this forces them to get behind * and realign themselves with him again. And then they can all sink together.

The scenario you describe would work if *'s approval ratings were anywhere near a majority opinion. But I think the ones who are through with * are going to stay through with him, and the other 33% can't do any harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. then we're no better than them
that would be playing politics instead of adhering to the rule of law they swore to uphold-I agree-let the chips fall where they may and stop thinking so much-do what's RIGHT!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LZelig Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. 70% of dem voters...
70% of dem voters back censure. Senators will follow the polls, stay tuned...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. "...the power dry till after November."
As if the Rupubs wouldn't have their bulletproof legislation against anti-Bush measures in place by then? As if the GOP dirty tricks won't be smearing our best Dem voices by then??

Hit Bush (or BEGIN) hitting him now, while he's weak and unsteady...don't wait for the fight-bell to ring so he can last another round!

That "powder" is supposed to be gunpowder, I believe, yes? It's for fighting back with, not exchanging for wishes or used as moral capital....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. I would think it would have the opposite effect....?
Since they are already not very pleased with him, it seems talk of censure or impeachment would only validate their present feeling about Junior? I don't buy the argument that the Republicans are going to flock to the polls to defend Bush...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think any Repubs who still support Bush** would worry about that anyway
It's really very hard to argue that the Repugs weren't already aware of the risk if the Dems regain control of Congress this November. Conyers' impeachment resolution has been floating around for a while, and in their black little hearts they've known all along that Bush** has broken the law several times over and the only thing keeping him safe is their majority control. Feingold won't have added to that fear...but the polls showing gaining support for censure and impeachment sure will!

Maybe we should stop polling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Feingold is the lead dog, and the lead dog gets the best view
Of course, the lead dog is the first one attacked by any beasts lurking in the woods, too.

Remember the Murtha business? He had no traction initially, and now that sonofabitch has enough traction to pull a fully loaded tractor trailer out of a twenty foot muddy ditch--with his bare hands.

Things never happen as fast as we want them to. Keep mentioning censure; keep saying the word. Get it in the mindset of the nitwits. They can't keep attacking provinces as a distraction forever--first, they don't have the manpower; second, they will run out of provinces; and third, the people over there will start getting highly pissed off. And we don't have the logistic support in place to attack Iran....YET.

So keep saying the word. Exercise patience, but don't let the issue go away. It's highly unlikely that anything will happen before November--the GOP clowns up for reelection do NOT want their vote on the record as people head to the polls. If they vote "yes" for censure, they lose their RNC funding, and their campaigns dry up like a turd in the desert. If they vote "no" then their supporters do the same. It is in the GOP interest to stall this, make it go away, hide it.

It is in the Democrats' interest to keep this issue bob-bob-bobbing along....we don't NEED a vote today, but we do need DISCUSSION of a vote at least once a week from now to November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh, please!

HE HAS A 33% APPROVAL RATING!

33%. LOWER THEN NIXON.

Who the hell are they going to mobilize?

The VAST majority HATE Bush.

Ever think that it could ENERGIZE the other 67%.

Like I said...

Oh, PLEASE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shipwack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. Even if true, that is exactly why censure is a great move!
If the right-wing base is going to get riled up, let it be at a time of our own choosing. I'd rather them start getting riled up and tired now, when they have to push an unpopular President, than have them called in when the Republicans start getting some momentum.

Forcing them to attack us when we're strong is a basic tactic... Read "The Art of War" sometime... It applies to many things, not just war .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. They will energize their base regardless with
baseless slanders and rumors of no merit just to get them stirred... Either we fight back or we will be framed the party with no backbone or rule or law... They will use this against us either way.. At least this way we look like fighters, and who would you rather have on your team?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. Rosco, I see your logic and it makes sense. However, I believe
that the percentage of Americans who are mindlessly devoted to Bush is decreasing. And if I am correct, it might mean that the Feingold resolution will become a rallying idea that collects followers as it gains momentum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. and I have one word that makes the polls meaningless...
Diebold

all they have to do is give the IMPRESSION that the 'base' supports Shrubya... viola.. another mandate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You are absolutely correct on this. Perhaps I'm too optimistic,
but, I believe that if the Democrats overwhelm the vote counts in November, they can prevail even in face of the rigged vote machines. I say that because I don't think they are able to rig enough of the elections to cope with a huge majority, say 10% or so. If I'm wrong on that, then we might as well quit all of our discussion about this political idea or that politician and devote full time to cleaning up elections. That is exactly what has and is happening in Latin America. They are showing the people the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. if you believe that, then why oppose censure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Their real base is baseless.
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 04:52 PM by genieroze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. But, they're not saying that, they're pulling out the 'aiding the
enemy' line instead because what he's doing is indefensible. If it was baseless they could say that but calling attention to the censure motion itself could risk a voter actually reading the thing and wondering why they're not doing more than trying to cover his ass after the fact or why they aren't fighting harder for THEIR rights under the law. NOBODY likes the idea of domestic spying without oversight - nobody. It's not an us against them thing unless we continue to allow them to portray it as such. This is a betrayal of AMERCIAN trust. I'm an AMERICAN with rights and there's no room for partisanship in that statement. By not supporting the censure the democrats are actually making it political. Here is a golden opportunity to fight for the rights of all and not just for the majority. Even if they lose, they will have tried to govern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. They're base is scatter all over the place, so, in reality, there base
is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC