Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

St Patrick's Day in the Caribbean

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 07:00 PM
Original message
St Patrick's Day in the Caribbean
The only Caribbean territory that celebrates St Patrick's day is Montserrat (the island with several volcanic eruptions in the past decade) Back in the late 1700s the slaves planned a rebellion carefully for St Patrick's Day because the Planters usually celebrated the day by getting drunk. Unfortunately some house slaves told them about the plans and many were caught, killed and others punished. It is called the St Patrick's Day Rebellion and ex-slaves celebrate every year.

Tonight there is a major music show as usual with Caribbean artistes and Air Supply from Australia (I was surprised as well, but they are very popular in the Caribean).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Irish connection to the Caribbean goes back 300 years
From my recollection of West Indian history many of the earliest settlers in Montserrat were Irish, but they were generally subsistence farmers and indentured servants on the sugar plantations occupying the lower rungs of the socio-economic ladder, just one step up from slavery, while the sugar plantations were generally owned or run by the English who were not very favourably inclined to their Irish labourers and neighbors. There was also intermarriage and co-mingling between the Africans and the Irish leading to a large mixed race mulatto population.


Montserrat, however, never became a typical English West Indian island, where African slaves vastly out numbered a handful of Whites and racial mixture hardly ever took place. In the eighteenth century, Montserrat had two oppressed races. The Penal Laws, intended to crush Catholic, Celtic Ireland, applied also to Montserrat. The Irish, already reduced to poverty, suffered political disenfranchisement and religious persecution. Many of the young men emigrated but enough remained to constitute a peasant class eking out a bare living on marginal land. It was perhaps natural that the Irish and Africans at the bottom of the social structure worked, drank and made love together. An Afro-Irish population came into existence, its growth disguised by the tendency of English officials to count people as "Negro" if they had the slightest trace of African ancestry. We can glimpse the hidden reality when we find slaves named Bridget or Tom Kerwin and increasing reference to free "mulattos." In the eighteenth century, the sugar boom ended and fresh imports of Africans ceased to arrive in Montserrat. The process of Afro-Irish mixing therefore accelerated and each generation was more racially mixed than the one-before.

http://users.ev1.net/~gpmoran/Monteserrat.htm



After England's civil war and Oliver Cromwell's invasion and conquest of Ireland many of his Irish and Scottish prisoners got shipped off to the Caribbean islands to work as indentured servants on the sugar plantations. They had it pretty rough as they were often treated much the same as were the African slaves, and since they were not accustomed to the heat of the tropics it must have been quite a hellish existence for them, as it undoubtedly was for the Africans. In certain areas of Barbados until relatively recently descendents of these Irish/Scotch indentured servants could still be identified by their white skin and comparative poverty compared to the other white minority occupants of the island.

In Barbados, these poor-white descendents of these indentured servants were called "redlegs" (presumably from their ancestors sunburnt legs after working out in the sugar cane fields) as a term of derision by both the blacks and the better off whites.

After becoming friends with an Irishman, I got the impression that the murderous and inhumane treatment of the Irish by Oliver Cromwell's invading army 300 years ago is still a sore spot that they find hard to forget. It does help explain as well why there is still so much tension between the Catholics and the Protestants in Northern Ireland to this day.


Barbadosed

Africans and Irish in Barbados

During the 1600's, African slaves and Irish natives shared a common fate on the island of Barbados. Slaves first arrived on the island in the 1620's with the first white settlers and continued to be brought there as the need for labor created a new market for the international slave trade. By 1645, the black population on the island was 5680, and by 1667, there were over 40,000 slaves on the island. In the early years of the colony's growth, Barbados also became a destination for military prisoners and Irish natives. Oliver Cromwell "barbadosed" Irish who refused to clear off their land and allowed other Irish to be kidnaped from the streets of Ireland and transported to Barbados. Those who were barbadosed were sold as slaves or indentured servants, to British planters. They lived in slave conditions and had no control over the number of years they had to serve. The number of Barbadosed Irish in not known and estimates very widely, from a high of 60,000 to a low of 12,000.

http://www.yale.edu/glc/tangledroots/Barbadosed.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Correct
the English used the poor Irish as Indentured Servants first in Barbados. The Irish were able to escape way more easily than the Africans. Still the cruelty of the English will not be forgiven in these parts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackHeart Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why not?
How many hundreds of years ago was the English abuse? The English banned slavery well before the USA did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC