What will Bush's numbers be AFTER the warrantless physical searches info

liveoaktx

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 09:13 PM
Original message

What will Bush's numbers be AFTER the warrantless physical searches info

comes out? How low can he go? I don't think ANYONE is gonna go for having their offices or homes searched without a warrant (well, maybe a few koolaid drinkers, that same percentage that thinks Saddam did 9/11)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

leftchick

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message

1. how will it come out with no hearings?

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

napi21

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. Supposed to be a story in US News & World Report on Mon, and

it will be up on their web site tomorrow night. I'd BET it will be a topic on cspan's WJ Sun, Mon, or Tues. too.

If it makes enough noise, it ust might hit the MSM too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Warren DeMontague

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #2

4. Ah. Hmmm. With specifics? nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

liveoaktx

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #4

8. VIDEO from KO

Turley

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

leftchick

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Mar-18-06 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #8

13. omg! I missed that

That was simply stunning. Perhaps the senate will be shamed into having hearings now!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Warren DeMontague

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message

3. Uh, if you mean we're ever gonna get any REAL answers as to

who was being spied on illegally, and why-- man, I hope you're right, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

liveoaktx

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #3

7. I believe it is slowly seeping into people.... Americans do NOT

want to be spied on. And I think when they find out the Bush administration wanted to do warrantless physical searches of people and DID SO IN AT LEAST ONE CASE, they aren't gonna like it.

I look forward to below 30-maybe Bush will match Cheney.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Kansas Wyatt

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message

5. If the warrantless wiretaps hit people upside the head like a 2 x 4

And woke them up, this is going to really piss them off. They barely held the last episode together enough to prevent an investigation.

But, in all fairness, BushCo & Republicans, Inc. are setting many precedents for the anti-gun liberal opposed to extreme right wing groups, who will be the next President of the United States.:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

windy252

(742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message

6. I hate to say it

but I think you underestimate the blindness of some people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

salin

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message

9. I have completely missed your reference

??? Conjecture - or brewing story?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

kainah

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #9

10. brewing story

apparently US News and World Report will have a story online tomorrow night -- and on newstands Monday -- saying that Bushites were justifying warrantless physical searches in addition to the wiretapping. One terrorism suspect's lawyer says his (the lawyer's) office and home were searched without a warrant.

Keith Olberman has a segment on it with Jonathan Turley.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

salin

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #10

12. I am lost

how does a story, that justifies searching the lawyer's home without a warrant, bolster the position that such searches are justified? Or is it another example of bushco ineptness - try to frame a justification that simply raises more suspicions?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

williesgirl

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-17-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message

11. See this thread - has video - more info available online at US News

I think on Saturday

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x690887

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Mon May 13th 2024, 04:42 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.