Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

!?!?! MO bans contraceptive funding for low-income women !?!?!?!?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:10 PM
Original message
!?!?! MO bans contraceptive funding for low-income women !?!?!?!?
and they don't want abortions?????

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/local/14109047.htm



Posted on Thu, Mar. 16, 2006
Low-income women would be affected
House OKs birth control funding ban
By KIT WAGARThe Star’s Jefferson City correspondent

JEFFERSON CITY — The Missouri House voted Wednesday to ban state funding of contraceptives for low-income women and to prohibit state-funded programs from referring those women to other programs.

Critics jumped on the proposal, saying it would lead to more abortions and more unwanted children on welfare.

But the proposal’s sponsor, Republican Rep. Susan Phillips of Kansas City, said contraceptive services were an inappropriate use of tax dollars. “If doctors want to give contraception privately or personally, they can,” Phillips said. “But we don’t need to pay for contraception with taxpayer funds.”

more....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. And no one is allowed to have sex either.
Ah, fundy world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. This was discussed yesterday, and I
will say again what I said then: watch out for Griswald vs. Connecticut. This was the landmark case that started everything. In Griswald, the SC determined that the state was intruding on the privacy rights of a married couple by prohibiting the sale of birth control methods. This was the case where "privacy rights" was first discussed. The nut jobs are going to start to chip away at it, just watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. They're probably hoping
this is challenged, so they can take it to the Supreme Court. Griswold was the case that established a right to privacy, & became the precedent for Roe v. Wade. If they can overturn Griswold, they've overturned the legal basis for abortion rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. after all, if you give contraceptives to women, they will be promiscuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. So...
How do they feel about chastity belts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redirish28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not to sound rude or demeaning BUT these are the people who need it
the most.


Maybe it was a bias study my wife showed me but it concluded that most low income women have at least 4 children and do not think about protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Of course birth control is so much more expensive than paying
to raise a child to age 18. :sarcasm:

Rep. Phillips has her priorities all wrong. This is soooo messed up...and frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Who was funding the
push for that bill? This is totally screwed up! What would happen if those fools also had a major boycott of their tourism. I guess Susan Phillips thinks a better use of tax dollars is welfare for unwanted kids--juvenile detention for unwanted kids--prisons for people who didn't have a chance because they were unwanted kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. They don't want birth control OR abortions. What they DO want is
cannon fodder and slave labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. I suppose that soon
they will be angling to change the child labor laws to allow kids as young as 5 to work in factories for up to 12 hours per day. This must be how they plan to end the outsourcing of jobs to China.

This country is really so fucked up that I can't even think about it seriously anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. And People Thought I Over-Reacted By Getting Sterilized Twice!
Welcome to the Republic of Gilead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC