Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LOL !!! - Newbie Freeper BOLDEAGLE, Proves Libby Innocent !!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:37 PM
Original message
LOL !!! - Newbie Freeper BOLDEAGLE, Proves Libby Innocent !!!
Documents show Libby NOT guilty because Brewster-Jennings not secret. Scooter must...

Posted on 03/20/2006 11:28:20 AM PST by Boldeagle

<snip>

For the sake of the President's program, Scooter must--can--clear good his name, here's how.



No leak, no leak crime. It's as simple as that. Scooter Libby can clear his good name, as this very, very recent news shows. NOTE: He has to, because a conviction could cripple the administration and hurt the cause of good government for years to come. He can do it.

The Administration picked a real bulldog in special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald. When Scooter comes out of this smelling like a rose, as this shows he probably will, no one will be able to say the fix was on. Fitzgerald is tough.

Libby will win for the simple reason that Valerie Plame-Wilson and her proximate employer, Brewster Jennings, were not secrets, not undercover. There was no leak. The intensive investigation of Libby amounts to illegal entrapment because there was no reason for such intense scrutiny. Libby was busy working the biggest national-security issues at the very top of our government, trying to protect our butts. That's why he misspoke himself in speaking to FBI agents and trying to recall minutia for the grand jury.

Some amunition has come from unexpected (and possibly unsuspecting) quarters:

<snip>

Link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1599755/posts

Just when ya think the Kool-Aid drinkers have had their fill, another new one jumps into the Jello mold!

:rofl::crazy::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Freeps. The gift that keeps on giving.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sometimes I wonder if it's something in that water, then I wonder if it
isn't a problem with education in America (then I remember we aren't all that dumb), then I just throw my hands up and quit trying to figure it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Libby was not indited for leaking, he was indited for lying
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 06:41 PM by Sapere aude
I think that was the charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:40 PM
Original message
He was charged with PERJURY
It doesn't matter if Valerie Plame was a figment of someone's imagination. He lied to the Grand Jury. Unless of course Conservatives don't believe PERJURY is a crime.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well now it's just perjury about national security.
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 06:55 PM by Freedom_from_Chains
Now if it was perjury about sex, that would be a hole different matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow. Are they really so clueless???
Libby isn't charged with leaking anything. He's charged with lying to the grand jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. They're after him for LYING to the Feds, but hell, never mind THAT small
and pesky detail!!!

It's never the crime, it's the cover-up that gets 'em, every time!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Boldeagle is probably Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. No shit! But I seriously don't think cheney is that stupid....
then again maybe he is, 'eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Maybe Ashcroft.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I Thought Ashcroft Was SORE-EAGLE ...
:shrug:

:evilgrin::hi::evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Ow! Ouch! Ow!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is that what Jeff Gannon is calling himself these days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Except the CIA chef and the "half-secret" diplomats
which are tolerated and often work together with allies at embassies, EVERYBODY IS SECRET. Slate had a very good article about that, lost the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. I especially like the entrapment part--
Sorry, buster, but "there was no reason for such intense scrutiny" is not a defense to entrapment. If ya don't believe me--head over to your local courthouse and watch a few drug trials.:rofl:

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hilarious!
I'd like to see his face when someone finally tells him that perjury is perjury, and undercover agents had nothing to do with Libby's charges. But then, they still all think Clinton was impeached for a blow job. No, it was perjury. I still say it was no one's business and he should have just kept his mouth shut and refused to go into something that was nobody's business except his and Hill's. Then he would have never been caught in a lie;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, that settles it then.
Case closed. Now, can we please let Scooter get back to conducting the people's business?



:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. LOL!
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 07:02 PM by sfexpat2000
Sure, or in a better fit, a towel boy at the Hilton.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzledmom Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. "That's why he misspoke himself in speaking to FBI agents...
and trying to recall minutia for the grand jury. Gimme a break. He misspoke. Yeah right, here in the real world we call that perjury. If the guy can't remember what he said when questioned by the Feds on an issue of national security he shouldn't be in the freakin White House. Of course this is just using his own words against him, never mind the fact that that bastion of liberal thought, the CIA says it was a leak, it was an undercover operation, and that years of work and many agents were compromised in the outing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. *SNORK*!!!!!!!!!
Garsh, I'm impressed! This guy has the inside scoop on "Who's Who in the Undercover CIA Agent World"!!!!

:rofl: :spray: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrioticLeftie Donating Member (909 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. Okay, now I'm convinced...
They try to live in denial.

"Say it ain't so, George, say it ain't so............It ain't? Ah, mercy me, for a second I feared I would have to think for myself!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. A frim grasp of the tissues. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's Bulldog!! Hi Jeffy??
Miss those WH sleepovers with Scott eh??

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. LOL !!!
:rofl::hi::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. One Last Kick Fer Laffs !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC