BUSTED!!!!!!!!!!!!! Keith just played snippet of *'s SOTU

where he tied Saddam and OBLaden together.

Lying fuck.

There for awhile it was in every speecification . . .

it dwarfs the Nixon plumbers!

The White House says spying on terror suspects without court approval is ok. What about physical searches?

By Chitra Ragavan

3/27/06

In the dark days after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, a small group of lawyers from the White House and the Justice Department began meeting to debate a number of novel legal strategies to help prevent another attack. Soon after, President Bush authorized the National Security Agency to begin conducting electronic eavesdropping on terrorism suspects in the United States, including American citizens, without court approval.

Meeting in the FBI's state-of-the-art command center in the J. Edgar Hoover Building, the lawyers talked with senior FBI officials about using the same legal authority to conduct physical searches of homes and businesses of terrorism suspects--also without court approval, one current and one former government official tell U.S. News. "There was a fair amount of discussion at Justice on the warrantless physical search issue," says a former senior FBI official. "Discussions about--if happened--where would the information go, and would it taint cases."

FBI Director Robert Mueller was alarmed by the proposal, the two officials said, and pushed back hard against it. "Mueller was personally very concerned," one official says, "not only because of the blowback issue but also because of the legal and constitutional questions raised by warrantless physical searches." FBI spokesman John Miller said none of the FBI's senior staff are aware of any such discussions and added that the bureau has not conducted "physical searches of any location without consent or a judicial order."

In December, the New York Times disclosed the NSA's warrantless electronic surveillance program, resulting in an angry reaction from President Bush. It has not previously been disclosed, however, that administration lawyers had cited the same legal authority to justify warrantless physical searches. But in a little-noticed white paper submitted by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to Congress on January 19 justifying the legality of the NSA eavesdropping, Justice Department lawyers made a tacit case that President Bush also has the inherent authority to order such physical searches.

In order to fulfill his duties as commander in chief, the 42-page white paper says, "a consistent understanding has developed that the president has inherent constitutional authority to conduct warrantless searches and surveillance within the United States for foreign intelligence purposes." The memo cites congressional testimony of Jamie Gorelick, a former deputy attorney general in the Clinton administration, in 1994 stating that the Justice Department "believes, and the case law supports, that the president has inherent authority to conduct warrantless physical searches for foreign intelligence purposes."

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060327/27fbi...

:rofl: :rofl:

Sleep tight Snotty. See you in the morning hehehehehehe for another fire hydrant moment.

Been busy.

he gave a speech today in Cincinnati and denied it to the hilt.

Lying bastard.

:hi:

I was going nuts looking for it.

Just trying to catch up with the B'lies..heh, heh, heh :)

Coming up soon, Love da' Keefer :loveya:

Emit posted it.

Just heard him say from a speech today that we are fighting the people in Iraq who attacked us on 9/11.

he said "I never said there was any connection."

Then again, what else is new?

Okay...I guess after further thought it's not a contradiction....technically.

So this week the story is although he admits Sadaam had no connection to Al-Queda and lies by saying he did not say that, the people attacking us in Iraq now were the ones who attacked us on 9/11.

I think I have it now. So hard to keep up with all the lies.

singing at Libby's trial.

that he knew he never specifically said Saddam ordered the 9/11 attack. I wondered if he threw that part in to have an out when people found clips or quotes of him tying Saddam with 9/11.

:popcorn:

I know I saw one earlier today.

:wow: They wouldn't do that.....would they?

posted by Emit.

Liveoak recorded him saying it today: http://www.canofun.com/blog/

I'm a big Keith fan. Keith, you've got a following!

I was just saying the other day that I would like to see a montage of film clips showing BushCo lies... especially the kind where they say "No, I am not the brain specialist! No! No, I am not!" "Yes! I am the brain specialist!"


I couldn't resist the Monty Python reference:)

between Saddam & 9-11.

I'd like to see all his filmed lies side by side with the first story he told...

You have to remember that Chilabi was outed as a liar and BushCo admitted they were given bad intelligence (despite the fact that we deserve a POTUS who knows the difference). Then he turns around and says that Hussein "chose war". I've wanted to ask Dumbya ever since... how did Hussein choose war?

Bush said it wouldn't matter that Iraq had to be destroyed.

I love it :D

and LiveOakTx recorded it:

http://www.canofun.com/cof/forums/forum-view.asp?fid=31

lie without blinking, even though the very things they are lying about saying are on tape and and video I've lost count of how many times they have done this. :eyes:

:D

:rofl:

um... cajones Bush would be spending the rest of his life clearing brush....

Knocked down a couple of buildings. Crashed some planes.

Bush really needs to get over this obsessive search. OJ stopped looking. Can't smirk?