Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Even with Earpiece, Bush Can't Defend Himself Against Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 10:58 AM
Original message
Even with Earpiece, Bush Can't Defend Himself Against Impeachment
Even with Earpiece, Bush Can't Defend Himself Against Impeachment
By Bob Fertik
Created 2006-03-21 10:40

Once again, George Bush went before the world without a single idea in his head, just an earpiece in his ear feeding canned answers from Karl Rove. And once again, the press acted completely oblivious to the farce in their faces. When the truth about Bush's earpiece comes out, the entire corporate media will collapse with the Bush administration and the GOP.

Now on to the "substance" of the press conference.

Helen Thomas hit Bush right between the eyes with the question Bush cannot answer: why the hell are we in Iraq, wasting thousands of American lives and trillions of America's taxpayer dollars?

Thomas pointed out that every reason Bush gave for the war turned out to be lies. She also pointed out that Cabinet officials like Paul O'Neill said Bush wanted to invade Iraq from the day he stole the White House.

Bush replied with his Biggest Lie: that Saddam refused to allow UN inspectors into Iraq, and refused to disclose all of his government's records on WMD's.

I have blogged about this Big Lie repeatedly, but the Corporate Media - and most of the progressive blogosphere - refuses to discuss it. It's time for the silence to end. It's time to start screaming about Bush's Big Lie.

http://www.slate.com/?reload=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have heard his remark before about Saddam refusing to let
weapons inspectors into Iraq and I've wondered if anyone told Bush that they had to leave Iraq so he could start his invasion. He seems oblivious to the fact that they were there, with apparent open access to any site they wanted to inspect, and had to get out because of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He's playing stupid. He *ordered* them out.
Not that it mattered.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/1121-08.htm
Published on Thursday, November 21, 2002 by the Mirror/UK
Bush Aide: Inspections or Not, We'll Attack Iraq
by Paul Gilfeather

GEORGE Bush's top security adviser last night admitted the US would attack Iraq even if UN inspectors fail to find weapons.

Dr Richard Perle stunned MPs by insisting a "clean bill of health" from UN chief weapons inspector Hans Blix would not halt America's war machine.

Evidence from ONE witness on Saddam Hussein's weapons program will be enough to trigger a fresh military onslaught, he told an all- party meeting on global security.

Former defense minister and Labour backbencher Peter Kilfoyle said: "America is duping the world into believing it supports these inspections. President Bush intends to go to war even if inspectors find nothing.

"This make a mockery of the whole process and exposes America's real determination to bomb Iraq."

(snip)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC