Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colin Powell: "Leadership Is All About Followership"...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:52 AM
Original message
Colin Powell: "Leadership Is All About Followership"...
Colin Powell: "Leadership Is All About Followership"...
The Oklahoman | Jay F. Marks | March 22, 2006 at 09:11 AM

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell blended business with diplomacy Tuesday to describe the characteristics of good leaders.

The retired Army general detailed these qualities as he explained the United States' role in world affairs during a speech at Oklahoma City's Civic Center Music Hall.

... "Leadership is all about followership," Powell said.

Effective leaders are able to get the most out of the people following them, he said, by putting them in a position to succeed with the tools they need to do their job.

more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/03/22/colin-powell-leadership_n_17685.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. With the tools they need to do their job
Edited on Wed Mar-22-06 10:00 AM by kenny blankenship
Like little fake vials of anthrax powder?
Which you falsely claim are in someone else's possession?
Leadership! So simple really: it's a matter of props and myths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right on!
When it comes to 'followership' - blindly following behind the incompetent, the untruthful, the stupendously ignorant without question -Powell knows whereof he speaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. I know someone who works at State Dep't who says workers loved Powell
I'm not going any further describing this person because I don't want to get him/her in trouble, but my contact said that Powell was very good to his people at State and did what he could to make his department work and improve morale despite the Bush administration.

My contact also said that rank and file bureaucrats were not crazy about Albright and they absolutely can't stand Condi.

My contact also said that people of that level in government do not speak out against their leaders and for a high level official and military man like Powell to denounce Bush would be unheard of.

My own take on Powell is that if he believed that going into Iraq was the wrong thing to do, he should have distanced himself from Bush much earlier than he did even if it meant offering his resignation. They used him, he allowed himself to be used and he is an accomplice to the crime--if not one of its main perpetrators.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Boy Is That Stupid
Leaders are good leaders when people follow them without feeling they have to, or without even knowing their being followers. There is no special skill required to be a follower. Anyone can do it. That, Colin, would be the difference between being a leader and a follower.

Idiot!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. My take on Powell:
I think he's a good man who didn't realize what a lair of snakes he was signing on with, and then was too slow in extricating himself.

Since he left office he has said a few things that indicate his opinion on this administration, but he has held his tongue from spilling the beans. I can only think there is one reason for that: He knows his family would be at risk if the NeoCons ever felt he might fully open his mouth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Colin blew it
He could have saved this country it's Bush induced march to suicide if he had the character to RESIGN instead of giving than damn UN Speech.

They may not have been able to pull off this whole fiasco if Powell bailed on them.

His conduct in this case was TREASONOUS.

-85% Jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC