Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Today, the Bushbots let Rumsfeld play Beat The Press

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:30 AM
Original message
Today, the Bushbots let Rumsfeld play Beat The Press
With characteristic inefficiency, Rum decides to pick them off one at a time-

Q: -- aside from the retired two-star general calling you incompetent and asking you to step down in an op ed over the weekend, we also had a column from Maureen Dowd in which she quoted an unnamed administration official saying that you don't hold the same sway in meetings and that you're treated as, quote, "an eccentric old uncle who's ignored."

SEC. RUMSFELD: You like to repeat all that stuff, don't you? (Laughter.) On camera? Did you -- did you get that? (Laughter.) Let's make sure he got it. He loves that stuff. It's a sure way to get on camera! You'll be on the evening news.
(...)
Q: Do you hold the same sway in meetings?
(...)
SEC. RUMSFELD: If you believe everything you read in Maureen Dowd, you better get a life. (Laughter.)


Oh, snap :eyes:

Squinting, at times he widened the spray-

Q: Mr. Secretary, given the performance of the Iraqi security forces, as the admiral just talked about, are you still confident that the size of the U.S. force in Iraq can be brought down significantly this year?


Reasonable, right? We're in a costly conflict, casualties are mounting. Of course there should be an open and ongoing flow of information between the press, on behalf of the public, and government officials. No, no, no! says the SecDef. He's answered this one already! Oh my golly, lay off already. You just bought yourself some patronization, mister-

SEC. RUMSFELD: Jim, I don't know how many times I have to answer this. The level of the forces -- we'll try it one more time. All together: The level of the forces in Iraq will depend on the conditions on the ground and the recommendations of the commander. And if you can predict precisely what the conditions on the ground will be and what the recommendations of the commander will be, I can tell you precisely what the trajectory, up or down or level, might be of those troops.


http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2006/tr20060323-12695.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sad part is that his wise ass act doesn't work anymore.
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 01:38 AM by The_Casual_Observer
The bullshit management seminar "unknowable unknowns" talk only works when you are winning, otherwise it all sounds like prattle and two bit con.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You were very eloquent
His wise ass remarks Don't work anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Very Interesting, though
"The level of the forces in Iraq will depend on the conditions on the ground"

So if we are not lowering the level, then the conditions must be remaining the same, right?

And if we are increasing the number of ground forces, which we are, then the ground conditions must be getting worse, right?

Methinks he just blew this "the war is getting better but the media ain't reporting it" crap to hell and gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Very true! -good catch
"Methinks he just blew this "the war is getting better but the media ain't reporting it" crap to hell and gone."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. is rumsfeld the next les aspin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC