Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tennessee Senate approves bill to require DNA samples from some abortions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:44 AM
Original message
Tennessee Senate approves bill to require DNA samples from some abortions
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle.asp?xfile=data/theworld/2006/March/theworld_March705.xml§ion=theworld&col=

NASHVILLE, Tennessee - Doctors performing abortions on girls younger than 13 years old would be required to preserve a sample of the fetal tissue for law enforcement under a bill passed by the state Senate on Thursday.

The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation could use those samples for DNA tests to help prosecute rapists, said Democratic Sen. Roy Herron, the bill’s sponsor.

“Whoever has sex with a child 12 years of age or younger is committing rape, whether force is involved or not, and they ought to be prosecuted,” he said.

Herron said most of these rapes are committed by those who know the victim, often go unreported, and are not discovered until days, weeks or months later.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Okay, so we're not supposed to use fetal stem cells...
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 06:51 AM by theHandpuppet
... in research that may lead to cures for devastating diseases, but "lawmakers" deem it is okay to demand "DNA samples" of aborted fetal tissue from underage girls, purportedly to prosecute (possible) rapists?

What is wrong with this picture?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. as Planned Parenthood says-as long as privacy is upheld.



The “Child Rape Protection Act of 2006” passed on a 29-0 vote. A companion bill has lingered in a House subcommittee for a month and is not scheduled for discussion until April 4.

Similar legislation was signed into law in Kansas last year.

Keri Adams, of Planned Parenthood of East and Middle Tennessee, said her organization supports any measure that helps protect children against rape and wants to be sure it follows privacy laws.

The bill would require records be kept of the names and residence of the victim and parent or guardian. A doctor who violates the proposed rules would face a $500 (Ð415) civil penalty for the first violation, a $1,000 (Ð830) civil penalty for the second, and a misdemeanor for the third.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. $500.00 fine?
that's it?

I agree that as long as privacy of the girl and her parents are protected, not a problem with me...however, the FINE for individuals violating this is ludicrously low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Probably end up jailing a bunch of right-wing
daddies . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Deacons and the like!
Pass that in Utah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC