Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The reason for the "tense" U.S.A - Canada relationship.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:28 PM
Original message
The reason for the "tense" U.S.A - Canada relationship.
I'm tired of hearing people talking about the "tense relationship" between Canada and the U.S.A...Jane Taber on CTV's Question Period just brought it up again. She said that there may be a surprise gift (re softwood lumber solution) from the Bush government to Canada at the upcoming meeting of Bush and Harper, since Bush is happy that Harper has taken over from the Liberals....Have they all forgotten the great relationship Chretien had with Clinton? Actually, Clinton had a good relationship with most if not all of the other foreign leaders when he was president. Unlike Bush, he did NOT treat other countries like they were satellites of the U.S.A... Does it not occur to any of these clowns that the sticking point in the country to country relationship just might be George Bush?
P.S...This so-called gift from Bush is not a gift but what Canada is owed according to the rules of arbitration in the trade deal. Remember there have been 7 or 8 rulings on this issue, which have all gone in favour of Canada by the arbitration board, which was made up of an equal number of American and Canadian members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well said
Your P.S. is a point Americans need to hear.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Agreed. Kicked and recommended
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Something to do with the missile defence system too. He told them
he would go ahead, no matter what they said about it? ... brain is failing, somebody help me out..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. the only people who 'get along' with this (mal)admin
are lying, bloodthristy thugs, IMO.

I dare someone to prove me wrong. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Remember when Bush first took over he made a big deal of his "friendship"
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 02:03 PM by glarius
with Mexico's Vicente Fox?...and Russia's Vladimir Putin?...Now he's barely on speaking terms with either of them. I especially remember the Fox thing because it has been the custom for many years for a new American president to make his first visit out of country to Canada. Bush pointedly went to Mexico first to meet Fox and declared Fox his good buddy....:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Remember when he forgot to mention Canada in his
post-9/11 speech to Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Actually I don't think he "forgot" at all....Can't remember who it was
(it may have been David Frum) I heard say that it was left out on purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush just makes friends and influences people
everywhere he goes

NOT

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bush reminds me of a guy who is always whining about his ex-wives!
He complains that wife #1 was always cheating on him, and at first you kind of feel sorry for the guy. Then he says that wife #2 decided she wanted a career instaed, and wife #3 wanted to move to a different city, and wife #4 decided to get a cat even if he said he didn't want one ....

And pretty soon you realize that there's a REASON why he's had so many failed relationships with different people. The one constant in the story is him -- HE's the problem! Bush complained about Chretien, then he said that Paul Martin (surely not everyone's choice for a Mel Hurtig lookalike contest) was too anti-American. And Harper hadn't even been sworn in, when the White House slammed his Arctic policy.

The vast majority of Canadians get along just fine with Americans. We have American family members, friends, and business associates. We love Americans -- we don't like Bush because we suspect that he is not only a threat to us, but violating the ideals upon which the United States (our neighbour and cultural/economic partner since "day one") is based, and abusing the trust of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I agree wholeheartedly with what you say.....
It seems to me that Bush starts out thinking his new "friends" are just wonderful, for a while, and before long he's fallen out of love with them...Remember how he looked into Putin's eyes and saw his soul?...That love affair didn't last long...And in the beginning he called Fox, America's best friend and now they are barely on speaking terms....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Yes! Keeping track of Bush's whims is like watching 3rd-graders
... squabbling over "who is my bestest friend this week?". Apologies to all the 3rd-graders out there -- but my landlady's daughter came home crying last week after some fickle "most popular" girl in her class decided that she no longer belongs to the "in" group. (Oddly enough, her parents and I have been discussing the situation with her, and she felt a lot better after we drew some parallels between that trendsetting girl, and George W. Bush -- "just because she says something doesn't mean that it's true ... and even if she manages to convince some people to go along with her, she can't take anything important away from you unless you let her ...")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Canadians and their soft wood!!
Hey, we have markets to protect, too, and you guys are undercutting us with subsidized lumber.

I get along fine with Canadians EXCEPT on this lumber issue. If Bush caves on that, he'll have screwed up, which will be good for Dems, of course. It's Democrats who have lost jobs because of Canada's lumber policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The arbitration committees, made up of Americans and Canadians in equal
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 11:10 PM by glarius
numbers have adjudicated this 8 times and all 8 times have agreed that Canada DOES NOT subsidize lumber. Get your facts straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I've got my facts straight.
Like I said, you don't want to get stuck listening to a Canadian go on and on about how soft his wood is.

Canada is protectionist, and the US should be.

Those are Democrats losing those jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Read these references to prove you are wrong. No subsidies the ruling!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Oh, brother. Cry me a freakin' river.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. You're wrong about subsidized lumber...
just plain wrong.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. See what I mean?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. "See what I mean" is NOT AN ANSWER to my proof there's no subsidy!
Edited on Mon Mar-27-06 12:30 PM by glarius
Could it be because you HAVE NO ANSWER?...Hmmmm?....Just saying "see what I mean" is MEANINGLESS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. Let's face it Many World Leaders feel that Bush got in office TWICE.......
.....so that must mean the American people agree with his policies. That doesn't mean other countries have to like it, or put up with it. No country wants to be treated like a kid and be told what to do or how to do it. They want to be treated like equals.

World leaders don't see huge mass demonstrations showing the world how many people disagree with the Bush criminals so the world can only assume we like what we've got.

I can't say I blame the Canadians, French, or anyone else for their views toward this country right now. I'm not at all saying I like it but rather that I can understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. There is a distinction made between Bush and the U.S.A people by Canadians
In this country (and I would guess other countries), the people do not hold the American public in the same regard as we do Bush. Polls show that the vast majority of Canadians like the American people. It is Bush and his administration we abhor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Yes, but my point is that Canadians and others feel that Bush got.......
.....in two different times and so many - not all- but many now see Bush and the American people as one and the same. In other words, "You (Americans) apparently wanted him because someone voted him into office a second time so you must like what you got." That is the mindset many around the world have and I for one can't blame them because we don't see the massive demonstrations of common citizens blasting this administration.

I'm not saying all feel that way but enough do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
20. Great points, all of them.
I remember when people simply expected the United States to uphold its basic obligations as an ally.

It has all gone so wrong in the past six years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC