Why doesn't Mel Gibson release another movie about Christ?

I mean it is Easter time. His movie on the Crucifixion was well-received by many. What better way to celebrate a major Christian holiday than to have another big-time Hollywood film depicting the life of Jesus? Maybe he's planning another one for Christmas to celebrate Christ's birth? How about a movie celebrating the miracles and good works of our Lord & Savior?

Hmmm....Now I don't doubt the depths of Mel's religious convictions at all. But could it be that the reason we saw "The Passion of Christ" in the first place was due to all the blood and suffering in the story, and he knew that alone would draw in the masses? Could it be that he carefully calculated the blood lust of those in rwing Khristianity and said this would put asses in the seats but a movie on the good works and love of Jesus would not? Could it be that Mel, just like Tim LaHaye of the Left Behind books figured out how to tap that fertile market of conservative fundamentalism? Say it ain't so Mel!

Let's see a movie on God's love and miracles in this world. What the world needs now more than ever is God's love, not more blood and mayhem. God's love would sell wouldn't it Mel?

and we couldn't have that now.

so if jesus were alive today and born in a three car garage in Plano Texas, would he have grown up to drive a Hummer, have a W sticker on his car, and vote to send Mexicans back to Mexico?

Do you think he would have just been overcome by events and settled for turning water into beer bongs and doing really cool parlor tricks at superbowl parties?

It's too bad Mel & co. require jesus to justify doing good deeds, and frequently to justify doing evil in the name of good.

But it is at the core of the Gospel message. It is something that is discounted by Fundies and Liberals alike.

Seems kind of ambitious for you to plan on him making it in time for easter.

Bryant
Chekc it out --. http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com

Maybe he plans one for Christmas if he can put enough blood and mayhem into the story.

I don't know. Christmas is usally more of a time to focus on love and charity, isn't it?

Bryant

Why not make a movie on just that very thing, the love of Jesus and charity?

Plus I think it would be hard to balnace the love of Jesus and Charity with all the blood and guts.

Maybe an hour long movie based on the Monty Python character the Bishop.

Esperanto?

The buzz is it is really something else...and Mel even implied it contained criticism of the kind of adventurism Bush is practicing.

Mel is a bit whack, but he is talented....

I have no problem with him making a movie with a certain audience in mind...every filmmaker does that. Who do you the V for Vendetta is aimed at?

But when someone like him touts his religious convictions like that it would be nice if he'd show the public what the depths of those convictions are. Otherwise to me he's just a charlatan like all the rest.

He had a point he wanted to make with the Passion....and he made it.

Why is he required to bare his entire soul when we would not require that of any other film maker?

That many conservative christians are full of bloodlust. I never said he needs to bare his entire soul.
However if he wants to interject the promotion of his movie with how deeply religious he is I would just love to see how deep those convictions truly are. To me the lack of him or anyone else making a movie on the LOVE of God exposes the rwingers for the opportunists they truly are.

it's about torture of prisoners and sacrifice of virgins. Pass.

You could work tons of blood and gore into that one. When the Red Sea comes crashing down.

his gang of merry neo-con fascists. The right-wing are up in arms about their Golden Boy being a LIBRUL Bush hater.

Newsmax ran a story and when that happens you know somebody's got their diapers in a whiney bunch. If you goodle Gibson Maya Bush you'll get it and the original Time magazine article from the 27th of this month describing the movie.

(I am kidding. I mean, look at Bush. every day, he plays a fictional character, sometimes, without even knowing it.)

I just hope that if he does make a new movie, he gives the easter bunny all the credit that the hare so richly deserves.

A small detail most "Christians" tend to overlook.

on the part of those looking to cash in on the Jesus craze. Can't rule the masses with love. Gotta keep the FEAR OF GOD in their hearts!


Ever wonder why it's the FEAR OF GOD and not THE LOVE OF GOD? And when the latter expression is used it's in expressing anger or frustration, as in Oh for the love of God!

I saw a brief but horribly video synopsis of it when i watched "The God Who wasn't There" (www.thegodmovie.com).........

At one point, a Roman soldier is depicted driving a nail into Jesus' shins. Gibson revels in the blood sacrifice so intimately that for that shot he has some flunky just under the camera...squirting a few drops of blood UPWARDS in syncopation with the hammer...

Mel Gibson is one sick fuck.

Jesus, the Next Generation?
Revenge of the Christ?
Jesus, the Younger Days?

The story kind of got played out in the 1st film.

Next step, the Crusades.

The Passion 2 . . . Revenge of the Christ . . ."

The Passion of the Christ was the third highest grossing movie in 2004. You would think another religious movie would have been made by now. So what 1970s TV show are they doing a movie about this week?

However, I too wish they would release more Christian films. The book of Acts would make an awesome movie.

There are historical films from that period: Gladiator, Troy, Alexander. Maybe more.... Notable was the Ridley Scott movie about the Crusades that seemed to sidestep the question of religion. But nothing on the bible (the 10 commandments is, what, 40 years old?)

Instead we get Scary Movie IV and Friday the 13th part XXXVI.

I guess we can wait for Mel Gibson to do another Jesus movie in 2026 after he does Lethal Weapon 5 through 10.

I'd be happy with anyone making a decent Christian film. I couldn't bring myself to see the Passion because of the gore; didn't think I could handle it. It's not so much squeamishness but just I guess I'm too sensitive and get emotionally upset at this stuff. Maybe I'll rent the DVD -- somehow on a smaller screen it might not be as upsetting.

Must be getting squeamish in my old age............

never mind. Yes, how about the good works, the good things, the peace and tolerance and understanding going on?

This time, it's personal!

And why do I think that Easter is a scarier time at the Gibson house than Halloween?

I could see that. Where the saved are taken up to heaven and us heathens perish in eternal hellfire.

Hitchcock didn't do another flick about birds gone wild.

Good News? That liberal Jesus died on the cross. He was re-born. And he's a comin' back. And awhen he comes back you betta be right. 'Cause when he come back, he gonna come back to reap the harvest. He gonna burn all the chaff. Know whut I mean? He gonna burn everybody and cause rivers of blood to flow from all the billions he's a gonna kill. And rightfully so. Those people wouldn't believe the stories about him being God and all so off they go. Down to the fiery pits for allllll eternity.

There ain't nothing nice or liberal about the born-again Jesus. The one that's coming back. Yep. Always remember, he was "born again". Dat means he ain't the same.