Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Redstate.com" turning on poor Michelle Malkin: "Dead to me."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:43 AM
Original message
"Redstate.com" turning on poor Michelle Malkin: "Dead to me."
Edited on Tue Mar-28-06 12:44 AM by Bluebear
Tsk.



There are things worse than plagiarism, or the accusations thereof. Personal betrayal, for one. Threats of violence. Smearing a man's family. I am not an ink-stained wretch, so I beg forgiveness at the writers who may take umbrage at this statement, but the sum total of what was done to Ben Domenech this week is a thousandfold worse than plagiarism.

I don't agree with the positions taken by Rick Moran and Patrick Frey. But I can at least understand them. They don't know Ben, so it's easy for them to criticize a faceless blogger in order to take an abstract position against the monstrous actions he stands accused of. Misguided, yes. Treacherous, no.

It is entirely another matter, however, to know the man, to have worked with the man, and feel the irrepressible urge to show your fair-mindedness, to strut your reasonableness, to tell it like it is, sister! -- friendship be damned. All this before your former colleague has had the opportunity to speak.

Michelle Malkin -- for shame.

=====

Malkin is where she is because her writing has a certain acidic quality lacking in most blogs of the mainstream right. She's Coulter Lite -- a guilty pleasure we can't count on to rhetorically rip the guts out of the America-haters.

She's also an opportunist, and I mean that in every possible sense of the word. While she covers a handful of topics in depth, her style is the blogging equivalent of "If it bleeds, it leads." If it gets the juices flowing, if it gets that Sitemeter cranking like there's no tomorrow, I can instantly guarantee you that Malkin is all over it.

Until today, we thought that was just her blogging. How wrong we were.

Beware befriending Malkin. Because the moment something goes wrong, you will be thrown under the bus. You will be judged before you have a chance to speak. And whatever mea-culpa you offer will be judged inadequate for 120,000 readers to see.

I regret asking Malkin to speak out. And no one is asking her to say things she doesn't believe. Given her personal relationship with Ben, a recusal would have been perfectly in order.

But she just had to score the point, didn't she?

======
Dear Michelle Malkin,

First, let me begin by saying I've never liked you, so I'm biased.

Believe it or not, it's not for all the reasons you claim people don't like you. I think you are beautiful, so it's not jealousy. If I'm going to be jealous, trust me, it's going to be over someone like Angelina Jolie.

It's not because of your heritage/culture/etc. I could care less. I couldn't tell you what mine is and I'm a mutt so I can get away with it.

Frankly, it's because you bore me. Truth be told, for someone that is so smart, I expect you to say more and pad less. And to be wittier about it.

Perhaps what bothers me the most is that, of all the attributes I thought you might have, the one I had the highest expectation of was that of loyalty.

MORE:
http://machiavel.redstate.com/story/2006/3/24/195537/773
http://mrsnachos.redstate.com/story/2006/3/24/185519/699
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chomskyite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, just like Livia would have said
"Poooooooooooooooorrrrrrrrr Youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Get out the Cobert Report "dead to me" list
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petersjo02 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. That is the most hate-filled, ugly face I've ever seen
Why is it that all right-wingnuts are so ugly. They just ooze ugly from every pore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ack! That picture!
That's not a sight I needed burned on my retinas for life, thankyouverymuch.

Then, again, watching repubs eat their own is so much fun, the acidic burn on my corneas was worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. I guess I just don't possess the penetrating intellect
to be a successful writer--if these emotional mumblings are any example.
I remember the terrific picture, though. IIRC, it was just after some prankster from DU sent her a velvet covered, trick exploding vibrator!

It seems those folks have totally forgotten about truth, honor, integrity and the rule of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, wasn't there an assertion awhile back that her HUSBAND wrote
her material for her???

Let them fight each other to the death, for all I care...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. She can soak in his broth then. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. Redstate.org is like the least nutty of the right wing blogs
That is to say, it takes a few more hours for me to get sick reading it compared to FR, or that other site that shall not be named.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. For the day shift
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. this made me laugh HARD!
''Malkin is where she is because her writing has a certain acidic quality lacking in most blogs of the mainstream right.''

acidic, as opposed to what?

psychotically vituperative, for starters

moronically hebrephemic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. Malkin is a White-Supremicist BROWN person. Crazy enough 4U?
What more do you need to hear?

She is less worthy than any WHORE;
whores don't actually SELL their bodies,
they merely rent them out.

But Malkin has sold her SOUL, her very SELF,
to an IDEAOLOGY that thinks defecating on her face
is a fun party game.

I don't hate her; I will rather PITY her...
after she's dead.
Until then, I will mock her for being the
sad, soulless, ranting little meat-puppet
she has fought so hard to become.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Typical Bushites.
Never take responsibility for your own failings and attack anyone that points them out no matter how glaring they are. So long Ben your 15 minutes are up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC