Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Culture of Corruption: Record Shows Senators' 'Debate' That Wasn't

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 02:02 AM
Original message
Culture of Corruption: Record Shows Senators' 'Debate' That Wasn't
According to the official Congressional Record of Dec. 21, 2005, Sens. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) and Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) held a long conversation on the Senate floor about an amendment bearing Graham's name that restricts the legal rights of detainees in the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

"I agree entirely," Graham responds to Kyl at one point. "I have just been handed a memorandum on this subject," Kyl says later. Another Republican senator, Sam Brownback of Kansas, interrupts the two with his own commentary.

But those exchanges never occurred. Instead, the debate -- which runs 15 pages and brims with conversational flourishes -- was inserted into the Congressional Record minutes before the Senate gave final approval to the legislation. In legal briefs to the Supreme Court, which took up the issue yesterday, the Justice Department cites the material as evidence that Congress intended the Detainee Treatment Act to retroactively invalidate pending legal challenges by hundreds of detainees held at Guantanamo Bay. Graham and Kyl submitted a friend-of-the-court brief asserting the same thing.

Some Democrats, including Sen. Carl M. Levin (Mich.), whose name is also on the amendment to the law, have argued otherwise. They contend that the law was written to allow cases filed before its enactment to go forward........

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/28/AR2006032801685.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. 198 f*cking4 bay-bee
I guess the rethugs decided they needed their own version of the 'signing statement'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wow, that's pretty slimey. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. disgusting little weinie wankers
rewriting our Congressional record just to get their rocks off!? To inflate their flacid little power trips?! :mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't this illegal?
Or are we now beyond doing things legally in CONGRESS?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. fake debate for a fake deMOCKracy - what could be more apropos?
lol I'm not laughing because it's funny - it's not that kind of laugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC