Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I just heard that the Pentagon has dropped its appeal, clearing the way

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 11:07 AM
Original message
I just heard that the Pentagon has dropped its appeal, clearing the way
for the release of the remaining Abu Gharib photos.

why do you suppose they did that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'll just mistakenly assume you're being sincere in your question
and answer that it is because the photos have already been published in multiple places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. yes, I am being sincere
and not all of the photos have been released.

That's what the appeal was all about: to not release the remaining photos, outside of the ones leaked to Salon Magazine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Citing Salon's publication, government abandons its fight ..."
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/03/29/aclu_abu_ghraib/index_np.html

. . .

A Pentagon spokesman said Tuesday that the military would now review Salon's Web site to see if there were any images or videos that were part of the court case that were not published. "Under the terms of the agreement, within seven days, we will identify the images recently published on a media website that were of issue in this appeal," said the spokesman, Lt. Col. John Skinner. "If any images at issue were not published on the website we will release those images with portions redacted."

. . .

In a legal filing last summer, Gen. Richard Myers, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, argued that the disclosure of these images would "endanger the lives and physical safety" of U.S. military personnel, aid in the recruitment efforts of insurgent forces, weaken the democratic governments of Iraq and Afghanistan, and "increase the likelihood of violence against United States interests."

On Tuesday, Skinner, the Pentagon spokesman, repeated these concerns, but he acknowledged that he knew of no specific incidents that had resulted from the Salon publication of the material. "We've seen people exploit images like this before," Skinner said.

In September of 2005, federal District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein rejected the government's national security concerns, saying terrorists "do not need pretexts for their barbarism." He stayed his ruling pending an appeal in the 2nd Circuit, which has now been abandoned.
. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Salon Mag. already had them all?
They figure the Media won't show them? They've doctored them up so they don't look so bad now? They figure people don't care any more...it's old news?

Any of the above?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. So they can change the story and the blame
for the continual violence in Iraq and deaths of many.

Just my guess - now they will say - see you terrorist-lef-leaning-ACLU look at what you have done you have caused people to kill people and think ill of the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Murdock Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Scandal Fatigue..
Sadly, it won't have much of an effect. It'll get a blurb and a mention, but it'll be back to Natalee Holloway on the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC