UN 'demands' Iran stops uranium enrichment

· IAEA told to report back in 30 days on compliance
· Security council makes no mention of sanctions

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060330/ts_nm/nuclear_iran_dc


The full text of Rice's statement is available on the State Department Web site
http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2006/63833.htm

The transcript of Bolton's comments is on the U.S. Mission to the U.N. Web site.
http://www.un.int/usa/06_063.htm

The full text of the Security Council presidential statement is available on the United Nations Web site.
http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/sc8679.doc.htm

No one listens to the UN.

He'll just push past them no matter what they decide. He needs to be impeached to reign him in . . . even then, Congress still has to stand up to him.

and needs to be stood up too.
However, this resolution does absolutely nothing.

It was designed to. Even if it was crafted to do something it would be meaningless to the Bush regime. The point in marking this event was just that, to mark an event in the process. Its interesting that it doesn't mention sanctions, and it has the strangest language about the absense of evidence that Iran isn't doing something improper with the uranium. Guilty until they prove themselves innocent, I suppose.

So this is the UN security council reaction after months of prodding by the Bush regime for some strong statement or resolution. The only thing they could manage is this toothless, non-binding letter that draws it out for another month. That's where it stood yesterday. That's all.

We'll wag our finger at you in a most vehement way!

Welcome to DU!! :toast:

We'll have to see what comes of it - but The UN is the best hope for coming through this current conflict without war, in my opinion.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com