http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=290043&src=Published: 5/3/2009 12:01 AM
I guess the blame game is the way some people justify their irrational feelings about some facet of society they do not like or understand. It would be much better if people read the history of the labor movement and why it was necessary.
Without the labor movement we would not have paid holidays, pensions, 40-hour work weeks and a safe workplace and a middle class.
History shows that most businesses ran sweat shops and paid very little and job conditions were very dangerous. There were people killed trying to organize for better conditions and a better way of life. Read about the working conditions in China, India and other low-wage countries, which is the way it was here before unions.
As an apprentice electrician I was sent to school, taught the code, electrical theory, and on-the-job training. We should have had union trained mechanics in Iraq and Afghanistan and there would be no electrocuted GI's over there. The fact is they are sending IBEW men, who are out of work, over there to fix the problems. It would have been cheaper to do it right the first time.
I do not see any union executives making $20 million a year. The standard of living in a union area is much better than in a nonunion area, and so is the quality of work. Unions and business have to work together, as they once did, and we will be better for it.
Uncontrolled greed is what got us to this point; we have to get back to fair profit and wages and a better life for all. Union membership has never exceeded 30 percent of the work force, so to blame such a minority for our problems is ridiculous.
Richard Markiewicz