Miss California- Breast Implants weren't paid by Pageant - they were 'sponsored'

Run time: 03:45 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2JDkkmQACU   Posted on YouTube: May 02, 2009 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: May 02, 2009 By DU Member: tomm2thumbs Views on DU: 1909

 

I wonder which company sponsored the left one and which company sponsored the right one? Political organizations perhaps?

revokes its sponsorship??

...maybe just put a lien on them for the next contestant???

:rofl:

maybe Anderson talked so uncomfortably about this because he's had some quads and lat muscles added in? lol..

...they had to tatoo instructions on which one belonged on the left and which one belonged on the right???

:evilgrin:

...:rofl:

"SPONSORED" breasts!!!!!!!!

Only Carrie P. would be dumb enough to try and spin that take on her phony chest. See what happens when the bleach and man-tan go through the scalp to the brain....and the silicon is a larger mass than than the brain tissue!

:evilgrin:

Edit for typo

You have to get really close to read the fine print.

...I spewed my latte on my keyboard....:rofl:

Can you imagine the line up of volunteers to do that????

Bwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaah!!!!!

how could the organisation putting on the event do things to increase the chances of someone winning?


not really fair is it ?

...they should have given her a brain transplant?

All contestant caught getting any kind of augmentation should be tossed out and fined.

but if you have a legitimate health problem in thie country you're up shit creek baby. Geez things are fucked up in this country. :eyes:

:hi:

they can be sponsored again by Redi-Mix Concrete.

Just asking.

Will the breast write me monthly letters?

She was asked a question. She gave her honest answer. We may disagree with her, but the character assassination against her for giving an honest answer is downright juvenile. That Hilton character is has been especially disgusting in this matter.

Are we adults who can politely disagree, or are we children?

because she ...

(a) said she was happy to live in a country where people can "choose" gay marriage. That's simply wrong. A few states allow gay marriage, but the vast majority do not. So she was wrong.

then (b) she called marriage between a man and a woman "opposite marriage". That was hilarious .... but clearly, in a panic, she invented a total new term.

and finally (c) she then went on to REVERSE her prior statement in from (a) above ... she started by saying that she's glad to live in a country where you have the choice, but then later says she doesn't want to allow gay marriage.

So ultimately, she contradicted herself.

The person who was happiest about all this, of course, was the former Miss South Carolina.

(typo)

You can find dozens of orange, bleached girls with questionable boobs at any mall in California, and most of them are prettier than her.

Her bone structure is kinda horrible. Starting with her obvious nose job and moving on from there, there's really nothing about her that's unusually attractive, and it doesn't all combine well either.

If I ever get accused of soliciting. I was going to sponsor some horizontal recreation -- there, that sounds much better.

The current standard seems to be an adolescent boy body type with large boobs. This doesn't occur in nature; big breasts and big hips go together.
I'm just appalled that any beauty contest pushes such an unrealistic standard and "facilitates" plastic surgery to meet it. I consider it misogyny.
To me, that's what make this newsworthy.