Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Truth Behind The UK General Election" & Why Murdoch's Son Stormed Into The Independent's Office

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:45 AM
Original message
"The Truth Behind The UK General Election" & Why Murdoch's Son Stormed Into The Independent's Office
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 01:43 AM by Turborama
 
Run time: 01:28
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDw-1bYatIs
 
Posted on YouTube: April 22, 2010
By YouTube Member: theindependent
Views on YouTube: 346
 
Posted on DU: April 23, 2010
By DU Member: Turborama
Views on DU: 1429
 
The Independent reveals the truth behind the news, without fear or favour. With 24 hour rolling news, and the myriad sources of information online, the truth can sometimes get lost. The Independent is committed to exposing the full story, however uncomfortable that may be, or whomever it may offend.

Too much news is not news – it is spin and PR. Under an unapologetic, liberal banner, we will bring you the facts that many would rather you simply did not read.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/the-independent-truth-matters-1949116.html

-

Johann Hari: The forces blocking British democracy

Friday, 23 April

When did this switch from an election scripted by Charles Saatchi to one painted by Salvador Dali? If I had told you a month ago that Gordon Brown would be despatching naval warships to Spain, David Cameron would be jostling with a man dressed as a chicken and down to 30 per cent, and Nick Clegg would be identified alternately as "the most popular leader since Churchill" and a Nazi, you would have called for Nurse Ratched.

But something stranger still is happening in The Election That Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. Every day in this country, two big forces artificially drag the British government way to the right of the British people, making it enact policies that benefit a small, rich elite at the expense of the rest. We are not supposed to notice this, never mind try to change it. Yet suddenly, in this election, those forces have been exposed.

=snip=

The British media is overwhelmingly owned by right-wing billionaires who order their newspapers to build up the politicians who serve their interests, and marginalise or rubbish the politicians who serve the public interest. David Yelland, the former editor of The Sun, http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x530731">bravely confessed this week that as soon as he took his post, he was told the Lib Dems had to be "the invisible party, purposely edged off the paper's pages and ignored". Only a tiny spectrum of opinion was permitted. Everyone to the left of Tony Blair (not hard) had to be rubbished – even when their policies spoke for a majority of British people.

Both TV debates, then, have been a very rare moment in which a slightly more liberal-left voice could speak to the public without the distorting frame of pre-emptive abuse and smears. When, for example, have you ever heard the EU defended as plainly and clearly? The window of permissible opinion was opened a little – and people responded with a wave of enthusiasm. It could've been opened wider still – to the Greens, say – and found a receptive audience too.

Full eye opening article: http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/johann-hari-the-forces-blocking-british-democracy-1951687.html


Related articles from today's Independent:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/threes-a-crowd-how-the-unexpected-rise-of-a-third-contender-broke-the-cosy-twoparty-system-1951707.html">Three's a crowd: How the unexpected rise of a third contender broke the cosy two-party system

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/leading-articles/leading-article-feeble-attacks-and-reprehensible-smears-1951688.html">Leading article: Feeble attacks and reprehensible smears

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/sun-censored-poll-that-showed-support-for-lib-dems-1951940.html">'Sun' censored poll that showed support for Lib Dems

-





James Murdoch at the Independent: 'like a scene out of Dodge City'

Hugh Muir and Jane Martinson
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 22 April 2010 19.18 BST

After a lifetime at the helm of the world's most powerful media organisation and in the crosshairs of the left, Rupert Murdoch has, of necessity, developed a reasonably thick skin.

=snip=

But his son James seems less ready to turn the other cheek, as it were. And this would seem to be the most plausible explanation for why Murdoch the younger, the chairman and chief executive News Corporation Europe and Asia, caused a media sensation on Wednesday by striding across the editorial floor at the Independent newspaper to berate its editor-in-chief, Simon Kelner.

In common with so many of the unpleasant episodes involving angry young men in modern London, it was a squall about reputation and respect. The newly relaunched Independent had produced a series of relatively innocuous promotional ads assuring readers: "Rupert Murdoch won't decide this election. You will."

There is no evidence that Murdoch senior has even seen the ads, but witnesses report that directly upon seeing Kelner, who was supervising the final production stages of that night's paper, Murdoch the younger began angry remonstrations. "What are you fucking playing at?" was his opening gambit. A bewildered Kelner quickly ushered his visitors into his office, where they remained for what have been described as "frank and full discussions" for another 20 minutes. All were grim-faced as Murdoch, carrying a promotional copy of the Independent, accused the rival editor of breaking the unwritten code that proprietors do not attack each other and of besmirching his father's reputation. With his piece said and with the matter unresolved, the aggrieved media mogul left.

The episode left experienced journalists shocked. "They strode in like a scene out of Dodge City," said one. "Murdoch scanned the room, you could almost hear him saying 'Where is he?'"

Full article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/apr/22/james-murdoch-independent-dodge-city


-


Will Murdoch Lose Britain?
By MICHAEL WOLFF

Several years ago, Rebekah Wade (now Rebekah Brooks), then the editor of Sun, Rupert Murdoch’s British tabloid, started trying to convince Murdoch that his newspapers should support David Cameron, the Conservative party candidate for prime minister.

This took some doing because Murdoch had become a good friend and pretty loyal supporter of Prime Minister Gordon Brown. What’s more, Murdoch’s wife, Wendi, is a great buddy of Brown’s wife, Sarah. But Wade/Brooks is persistent and, in Murdoch’s words, “knows how to work my family.” She convinced Murdoch’s son, James, that Cameron was the certain future. James then went to work on his father, and a reluctant Murdoch—telling everyone who would listen that Cameron was too slick by half—sourly went along.

Now, Murdoch likes winners, even more than he likes Conservatives. One of the most famous headlines of his career appeared in the Sun after the Conservative victory in Britain 1992: “It's The Sun Wot Won It.” Murdoch is still stewing over an ill-timed and inept endorsement of John McCain over Barack Obama (again, against his better judgment—Murdoch likes Obama and was convinced to back McCain by Roger Ailes and New York Post editor Col Allen).


=snip=

In turn, the Independent newspaper ran a front pager yesterday with the headline “Rupert Murdoch will not decide the outcome of the election. You will,” challenging the Murdoch coverage of the race.

Later in the afternoon, in a coming-apart-at-the-seams scenario, Rebekah Wade/Brooks and Murdoch’s son, James—who will both face the wrath of Murdoch senior if they don’t produce a winner—stormed over to the Independent, breached its security systems, barged into the offices of the Independent’s editor-in-chief and top executive, Simon Kelner, and commenced, in Brit-speak, a giant row. Their point was that newspaper publishers don’t slag off other newspaper publishers in polite Britain, but also the point was to remind Kelner that he wasn’t just slagging off another publisher, he was slagging off the Murdochs, damn it. Indeed, the high point of the screaming match was Wade/Brooks, in a fit of apoplexy and high drama, neck muscles straining, saying to Kelner: “And I invited you to Blenheim in the first place!” Blenheim being the Murdoch family retreat and the highest social destination for all Murdoch loyalists and ambitious Brits in the media.

This is one way for empires to end.

Full article: http://www.newser.com/off-the-grid/post/448/will-murdoch-lose-britain.html


A lot more on this being posted in the UK forum by Anarcho-Socialist: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=191x29744

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Murdock OWNS Blenheim?
That's outright disgusting.

Although it has always been held by the biggest toadies
to the pound.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nope. It's just for hire for politico-corporate junkets.
The palace today remains the home of the Dukes of Marlborough — the present incumbent of the title being John George Vanderbilt Spencer-Churchill, 11th Duke of Marlborough. Like his forebears he lives for part of the year in the palace, with his family occupying the same suite of rooms as the 1st Duke and Duchess.

The palace is open to the public, and contains tourist attractions in the grounds, including the butterfly house, a maze, a plant centre, and cafeteria, but the atmosphere is still that of a large country house. The palace is separated by a little distance from this other group of attractions (the 'Pleasure Park'), and the two are linked by a free miniature railway service, the Blenheim Park Railway. The progression from home to business has been essential to the palace's survival in the 20th and 21st centuries. Varied commercial concerns include a maze, adventure playground, mini-train, gift shops, butterfly house, fishing, and even bottles of Blenheim Natural Mineral Water. Concerts and festivals are also staged in the palace and park. While the Duke retains final control over all matters in the running of the palace, the day-to-day control of commercial aspects are outsourced to Sodexho Prestige, a division of Sodexho.

The grounds are also open to the public, on payment of an entry fee (£10 as of August 2009), but there is also free access to about five miles (8 km) of public rights of way through the Great Park area of the grounds,<14> which are accessible from Old Woodstock and from the Oxfordshire Way, and which pass close to the Column of Victory.

Blenheim Natural Mineral Water is bottled on the estate and sells this water in a niche market. Game, farming and property renting are also part of the Blenheim Palace portfolio.

In the state apartments, guests are more likely to be the invitees of a large company, or a couple who have paid to marry at the palace, rather than guests of the Spencer-Churchills. However, the ducal family still entertain in the state rooms, and dine on special occasions in the saloon, around the great silver centrepiece depicting the 1st Duke of Marlborough on horseback—the same piece that Consuelo Vanderbilt liked to call her cache mari because it conveniently hid her detested husband, across the table, from view. The many residents of Blenheim have each left their mark on the palace. Today it is as likely to be used as a film location as it is to be the setting for an aristocratic house party; yet it still hosts both. Blenheim Palace remains the tribute to the 1st Duke which both his wife and the architect Sir John Vanbrugh envisaged.

/... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blenheim_Palace#Current_situtation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thank gawd!
I've visited a couple of times, and the thought of
Murdoch owning the place made me queasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Murdoch's minions.....
we need to knock him off the pedestal he control a good chunk of the world. Imagine a foreigner coming here for citizenship only to expand his grasp on political control. The Brit's get it now, when will we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Comedy Central have a funny take on Murdoch and Co. storming the Independent's office & more


Indecision Internationale 2010: Taking a Dump on Nick Clegg

POSTED BY: Rich Johnston

=snip=

Most of the main newspapers in Britain are conservative ones — and conservative in the way that make Fox News look like Air America. And, today, all the front pages of all these newspapers, selling millions of copies across the country, have been going to war with Nick Clegg. Waking up to them, his wife might as well have tipped his breakfast in bed over his head (including the scalding coffee) as hand him the papers.

Old warhorse, The Daily Mail led with a front page splash "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1267921/GENERAL-ELECTION-2010-Nick-Clegg-Nazi-slur-Britain.html">Clegg Nazi Slur on Britain" and referred to an eight-year-old newspaper article it had unearthed in which Clegg talked of Britain, saying: "A misplaced sense of superiority, sustained by delusions of grandeur and a tenacious obsession with the last war, is much harder to shake off. We need to be put back in our place." That, however, wasn't good enough for The Mail. It unloaded two further barrels into the Clegg camapign, first alleging that Clegg had accepted payments from donors for his own personal bank account http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1267873/GENERAL-ELECTION-2010-Nick-Clegg-received-donations-directly-bank-account.html">to pay towards a researcher, and then that Hilary Stephenson — Mr Clegg's campaigns and elections director — was responsible for http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1267835/General-Election-2010-Lib-Dem-MPs-told-milk-expenses-leaks-reveal.html">encouraging expenses scams.


None of these were what you could call new stories, but Nick Clegg's sudden rise to ascendancy had forced The Daily Mail to dig deep and get desperate. And it was not alone. The Daily Telegraph led with the donors story, while The Daily Express had "http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/170690">Cleggs's Crazy Immigration Policy," which outlined his desire to let those seeking asylum in Britain work while waiting for their case to be addressed. Meanwhile, The Sun called him a "http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/apr/22/nick-clegg-denies-wrongdoing-payments">Wobble Democrat" over Afghanistan and immigration policy, with a later edition re-imagined as "Fried Clegg."

Those amusing headlines that The Daily Show uses? Business as usual for the front pages of UK newspapers. Although what wasn't business as usual was James Murdoch and Sun representatives http://www.newser.com/off-the-grid/post/448/will-murdoch-lose-britain.html">storming The Independent newspaper earlier today to complain against The Independent's attacks on The Sun's partisan covering of the election so far. A partisan nature that they've http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2661063/The-Sun-Says-Labours-lost-it.html">previously taken pride in.

Which is the equivalent of a troll finishing his rendition of "I'm a troll, fol-de-rol" for the sixty-eight time and then getting incensed when someone calls him a troll.

More: http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/04/22/indecision-internationale-2010-taking-a-dump-on-nick-clegg/



And...

Jon Stewart Schools the UK on Elections

From Indecision…

Evidently there's an election going on in England right now and they're trying to import some tactics from the US. But as Jon Stewart pointed out on last night's Daily Show, the Brits have a long way to go if they want to truly capture the pure uncut shamelessness of American politics. Still, the British have made a lot of progress (with a long "O" sound) since the days not long ago when all elections were decided solely by monocle size.
http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2010/04/22/jon-stewart-schools-the-uk-on-elections/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Recommended!
...and not just because you kindly gave my UK forum thread some PR.

If a Lib-Lab coalition entrenches election reform, then it pretty much means a permanent centre-left majority in the House of Commons. This then means no dismantling of media regulation for poor Rupert.

David Cameron's pledge to dismantle OFCOM (Britain's independent media regulator) was meant to be a sweetener for the Murdochs to throw their lot in with the Tory Party.

The rise of Clegg destroys the prospect of a Tory majority government that can accomplish media deregulation.

Murdoch's newspapers have spent the last six months criticising Gordon Brown (fairly on occasion, but spitefully unfair most of the time), while the papers last week has been demonising Nick Clegg in a ridiculously over-the-top fashion.

If a Lib-Lab coalition takes power on May 7, then Rupert Murdoch will have the very difficult task of mending bridges with the two most powerful men in the House of Commons, the same two men which have felt the vicious ire of his UK publications.

James Murdoch has really fucked things up for daddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. # 16. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MinM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. Rupert Murdoch's Sky News (UK) - A Fox in Sheep's Clothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC