offered *by* the US impeding upon her work as a journalist, she has reported on the deaths caused by US forces repeatedly that you may not have caught those pieces does not then
convert her into a "liar", she reports that "the army" hid the info for a week, that the process is a convoluted mess that does not lend itself to easy reporting of truth, she reports the Bill'O is "completely and utterly ludicrous" which is...not...arguable, she reports nowhere on behalf on the cheney/bush admin, now...
you may suggest as do i that we should never have gone in there
you may suggest that Saddam was better suited as dictator/tyrant of a sectarian Iraq, especially after reviewing a bit of Mesopotamian history which indicates that what we now know as Iraq was forever a lose assembly of tribes (still being played out) held together, by little more it would seem, than violence, death, fear, and intimidation since the dawn of history; the fertile crescent...but Iraq has been what it is for 1,000's of years, and in spite of the death & chaos we have ham-handedly brought un-invited; we will have made no difference in that regard
it is fairly common knowledge, however, that Logan calls them as she sees them. does she 'see them all'? who does? do you?
i think some have a hard time moving past her personage, her screen image
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/17/AR2006051702337.htmlin the end we are both entitled to ours opinions, that much is clear