Clinton attacks Edwards and Obama on change, Edwards defends Obama

Run time: 02:42 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZGo_IaGkuE   Posted on YouTube: January 06, 2008 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: January 06, 2008 By DU Member: MalloyLiberal Views on DU: 514

 

in to the flamer and slurrer and ass kisser that Obama is.

Obama has stolen Edwards entire platform from 2004.

Everyone has their point of view and every right to that view. The reason for discussion and debate is to change the others point of view. Here is mine.

My view is that she is an establishment politician with close ties to the Bush administration and big business.

She will not even state that she would have troops out of Iraq by 2013.

She does not represent change in the least. She represents the status quo.

She voted to fund this war time after time. That in itself is enough for me.

She receives six times the money from big business than labor.

Some Contributors: Goldman Sachs-Major proponent of privatizing Social Security
Morgan Stanley-Another investment banker and proponent of privatizing Social Security
Citigroup-Helped repeal federal law allowing banks to get into other businesses
JP Morgan Chase & Co.-lobbied for bankruptcy reform and banking deregulation
Merrill Lynch-another investment banker heavily involved with Enron and ImClon
Time Warner-wants to relax rules allowing cable companies to own broadcast stations in the same market
Ernst and Young-leads efforts in blocking oversight of accounting companies

Exactly what are her 35 years experience and how does that translate to presidential aspirations?