Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU Applauds Senate Judiciary Committee Action Restoring Habeas Corpus Due Process Rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 02:07 PM
Original message
ACLU Applauds Senate Judiciary Committee Action Restoring Habeas Corpus Due Process Rights
Edited on Thu Jun-07-07 02:07 PM by babylonsister
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/detention/30027prs20070607.html

ACLU Applauds Senate Judiciary Committee Action Restoring Habeas Corpus Due Process Rights (6/7/2007)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: media@dcaclu.org

DAY OF ACTION - JUNE 26
> JOIN US IN WASHINGTON, D.C.


WASHINGTON - The American Civil Liberties Union applauds the Senate Judiciary Committee’s action to restore the crucial writ of habeas corpus. Today, the committee meets to mark up pending legislation, including S. 185 - a bill to restore habeas corpus for those detained by the United States. The habeas bill is expected to pass out of committee today and head to the Senate floor within the month.

The legislation to restore constitutional rights is in response to last year’s Military Commission Act, which stripped the constitutional right to habeas corpus from detainees in Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere. The MCA was a huge setback to civil liberties and was rushed through Congress in the weeks before the 2006 elections. The habeas bill would begin to undo the wrongs of last year.

"The Judiciary Committee is acting today to restore one of the most fundamental rights in America, the great writ of habeas corpus," said Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the ACLU’s Washington Legislative Office. "It is clear that the kangaroo court at Guantanamo Bay is not constitutional, as was made clear by the dismissal of charges against a Canadian citizen by a military judge on Monday. The process needs to be scrapped and Congress needs to treat the detainees in the war on terror in a just manner that begins with restoring habeas corpus."

News was made on Monday, when a United States military judge dismissed all charges against Omar Khadr of Canada, who was only 15 years old when detained by the U.S. at Guantanamo Bay. In a separate case on Monday, a different military judge dismissed all charges against Salim Hamdan, the same detainee whose appeal of the initial military commission procedures last year resulted in the Supreme Court invalidating the Bush administration’s initial set of trial procedures.

"Guantanamo has been one illegal trial scheme after another. But after all of the chest thumping by President Bush and Congress, there is no escaping the fact that not one person has been tried and convicted," said Christopher Anders, legislative counsel for the ACLU. "The latest rulings mean that none of the detainees will ever be tried under the Military Commissions Act because of sloppy drafting. After more than five years of people wasting away without being charged and tried, it’s time to convict the guilty and send the innocent to countries that don’t torture. The habeas bill is a good first step."

ACLU activists from across the country are gathering in Washington, DC on June 26 to demand the restoration of our constitutional rights.

For more information visit www.juneaction.org.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. rec'd
:hi: and going to add it to my LBN thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackHawk706867 Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. And about damn time they got around to doing this too! eom ww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bravo!!! Bravo!!!
Recommended!!!

I don't CARE that it requires a miracle for the thing to survive (because GOD KNOWS BushCO and his cronies will kill it ASAP),...I'm just grateful ACTION IS BEING TAKEN to restore what we've lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Off to the greatest for you. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have a problem with all this.
The concept of restoring habeas corpus seems to imply that the stripping was legitimate if not Constitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Valid point but how would you deal with it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't know. I guess it would have to come down to the language in the bill.
Maybe they should reaffirm habeas more than restore it.

And I wonder if Congressional restoration could be used to show precedent in cases against people whose rights have been stripped in the interim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The problem was with Abu Gonzalez
IIRC.. He said that we HAVE no right to Habeas Corpus.. we only have the right to "not have it denied."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That was just sickening. I don't understand why every Congressperson
did not immediately call for him to get the hell out of DC. The highest law enforcement official below the President, and he doesn't even understand the basics of law. Truly amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great news
This is very important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC