Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservatives May Target Schumer As Retribution For No-Confidence Vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:10 AM
Original message
Conservatives May Target Schumer As Retribution For No-Confidence Vote
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/11/resolution-schumer/

Conservatives May Target Schumer As Retribution For No-Confidence Vote

To counter the fallout of an Alberto Gonzales no-confidence vote, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has repeatedly said he will bring an alternative resolution to the floor. Today, Roll Call previews what that alternative, targeting Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), may look like:

“He may get a dose of his own medicine,” said Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-Miss.), adding, “Schumer is clearly way out of order. … This isn’t going to be free.”

One Senate Republican source explained that such a resolution would not name Schumer directly, but instead instruct the Senate to vote on whether a Senator who runs a campaign committee should be “using his political capacity to run the show” on an investigation such as the U.S. attorneys scandal. Schumer is the chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

“My sense is, we’re going to let them get cloture, and we’re going to talk about it,” the source said. “We have more dirt to throw at them than they have at us.”

This line of attack — that Schumer has a “conflict of interest” because he is investigating the U.S. attorney scandal while also serving as chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee — was first raised three months ago by Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA). It’s a complete distraction.

Schumer has no conflict of interest. The investigations led by the Senate and House Judiciary Committees are focused exclusively on the Executive Branch and not on Congress. Potential investigations into improper behavior by members of Congress would be conducted by the respective congressional ethics committees, as they should be.

Moreover, for many senators, the resolution is deeply hypocritical. None of those who previously attacked Schumer complained about the apparent “conflict of interest” that was raised in the 1990s, when then-Sen. Alfonse D’Amato (R-NY) was chairman of the Senate Whitewater Committee investigating President Clinton. As ThinkProgress previously noted, during that time, D’Amato was serving as national co-chairman of then-Sen. Bob Dole’s (R-KS) presidential campaign, as well as chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Eh. That often backfires. Take Lieberman for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh just do it then
It's only going to make them look like babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Or like they have no other viable options; sounds really lame to me.
Edited on Mon Jun-11-07 10:15 AM by babylonsister
God forbid they even consider doing the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Please do. I hope they all stand up and assert their loyaly to this unpopular AG.
Edited on Mon Jun-11-07 10:14 AM by Marr
The man is clearly corrupt to the core. Let them stand up for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. This just tickled me to no end...
<snip>

“We have more dirt to throw at them than they have at us.”

<snip>

Talk about denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah, good. Do it. Let's expose everything, if there's anything to expose. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. Do they want any cheese with their whine?
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. No doubt this ploy will rivet the attention of the American people
and distract them from such irrelevancies as the high cost of gasoline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder if GOPer Senators will ever do ANYTHING because it's simply right for the country,
rather than for political advantage or poo-flinging. This no-confidence vote would seem an easy, painless way to tell Gonzo he's a fuck-up--a politically safe no-brainer for both parties. Why rally around THIS assclown, of all people? Throw him under the bus today with a minimum of fuss and attention, and then get it off the front page for a while--they're being really stupid here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I pray the Dems use this ad nauseum when the election machine cranks
up for November 08. The rethugs deserve whatever they get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC