Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Giuliani Claims Clinton's Response To U.S.S. Cole Terror Attack Was "Let It Go"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 01:54 PM
Original message
Giuliani Claims Clinton's Response To U.S.S. Cole Terror Attack Was "Let It Go"
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/13/giuliani-cole/

Guiliani Claims Clinton’s Response To U.S.S. Cole Terror Attack Was ‘Let It Go’

Last night on Fox News, former mayor Rudy Giuliani repeated the myth that President Clinton failed to respond adequately to the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole, claiming that Clinton’s response to terrorist attack was during his administration was “let things go.”

During an interview with Fox’s Sean Hannity to promote his new “12 Commitments” to America, Giuliani said that Americans are being lured by the “very appealing” idea that the U.S. should “kind of act the way Clinton did in the ’90s.” Giuliani described this mentality as “don’t react, let things go,” and charged, “You know, we get attacked on the Cole. We don’t do anything about it.”

Watch it:

In fact, President Clinton was eager — at the recommendation of his counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke — to retaliate against al Qaeda for the U.S.S. Cole. But that attack took place in October 2000. As Clinton explained in a 2006 interview, both the CIA and FBI “refused to certify that it was Bin Laden was responsible” for the attack on the Cole until early 2001 which foreclosed on the possibility of a full response during the Clinton administration.

Further, while Giuliani asserted that “America needs leadership to remain on the offense,” on national security issues, his “12 Commitments” to America doesn’t contain a single reference to the war in Iraq. Giuliani defended the omission, claiming “the fluid situation there makes it hard to speak in specifics about the war.”

“Iraq may get better; Iraq may get worse. We may be successful in Iraq; we may not be. I don’t know the answer to that. That’s in the hands of other people.”

Guiliani’s comments demonstrate exactly how far out of touch with the American people he truly is. As a spokesman for American Against Escalation in Iraq said, “The notion that the war in Iraq does not need to be addressed by presidential candidates because it is ‘in the hands of other people’ is simply preposterous.”

–Ryan Powers

TRANSCRIPT AT LINK

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not what I've read and heard
I thought he put off waging an attack because he didn't want to dump it in the lap of the incoming president like Pappy did to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Giuliani has a snowballs chance in hell of ever holding office anywhere in the universe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venus Dog Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Please don't say that....
I said the same thing about * in 2000 :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I'll knock on wood if you will.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. GOP Rule #1
Never let the facts get in the way of blaming Clinton for something.

Fact: The GOP led congress had always been much more interested in trashing Clinton's personal life than national security. I don't know how many times I heard that any proposed military response to anything was just a diversionary tactic.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Or could you imagine the screaming of "Wag the Dog"
if Clinton had taken military action during the damn recount. They'd have claimed he was trying to help Al Gore. Why the hell didn't Chimpy do something when he came in - after all by then the CIA and FBI had finally concluded it was Al Qaeda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. hell, they screamed "Wag the Dog" when he bombed Iraq with UN approval
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, wrong, that was Smirk's response to septembertheeleventh.
He's got them mixed up again. Repuke mantra - blame Clinton for our mistakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. So in three months he was supposed to capture and either kill or bring to justice those responsible
but Bush has had almost six years to get bin Laden and has failed, and that's ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Shrub was given all the evidence and sat on his A$$ for 9 months
doing nothing. I guess that doesn't count as "let it go"...

F**k Rudy and the Horse he rode in on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Which completely uninvolved country does Rudy think we should have bombed
in retaliation? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. He's a lying sack of crap. There are people in prison right now
for the 1st attack on the WTC. That Clinton put there. To suggest that he would just "let it go" is flat out nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Somebody enlighten me.....I didn't know Bill Clinton was again
running for president. What in the devil difference, now, does it make as to what his actions on terror are. Why should they influence anyone's opinion of rudi the tooty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. always remember guillis' emergency management office being where?
I think it was close to one of the WTC towers. Didn't he also say something about it being ok to go back to work in the area for the first responders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Feb 01
As far as I remember, the definitive evidence of who was behind the Cole attack came in February 01.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. No - it came in end of Dec 2000, but Clinton thought the decision should be up
to Bush because he'd be stuck with the situation anyway, as Clinton was stuck with Bush1's decision to go into Somalia.

Clinton was trying to be considerate of Bush, but look where consideration for any of the Bushes has gotten this country and the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Rude-E Ghouliani is a one-trick pony.
He can go cheney himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. God I hate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. And his credentials for combatting terrorisim is...what? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. Why did Ambr to Yemin Barbara Bodiene, Republican, block investigation?
Why did the Republican refuse to issue FBI torrorism expert John O'Niell a visa to return to Yemin to continue his investigation? What was the Republican covering up?

Rudy?

Huh?

Rudy?

How's the air, Rudy?

How is the fucking air, Rudy, you killer?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC