Native Americans 12 million - Four centuries later 237 thousand
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gQcoOSKx7M "By conservative estimates, the population of the United states prior to European contact was greater than 12 million. Four centuries later, the count was reduced by 95% to 237 thousand.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2EyPWqXpVg But all the white men said Thats the cross of changes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-R9ulGK5nU8&eurl= Silent Warrior
Long ago, for many years
White men came in the name of god
They took their land, they took their lives
A new age has just begun
They lost their gods, they lost their smile
They cried for help for the last time.
Liberty was turning into chains
But all the white men said
Thats the cross of changes
In the name of God - the fight for gold
These were the changes.
Tell me - is it right - in the name of god
These kind of changes?
They tried to fight for liberty
Without a chance in hell, they gave up.
White men won in the name of god
With the cross as alibi
Theres no God who ever tried
To change the world in this way.
For the ones who abuse his name
There'll be no chance to escape
On judgement day
In the name of God - the fight for gold
These were the changes.
Tell me - is it right - in the name of god
These kind of changes?
Tell me why, tell me why, tell why
The white men said:
Thats the cross of changes ?
Tell me why, tell me why, tell why,
In the name of god
These kind of changes $40 billion--from Washington - betrayal for more than a centuryhttp://www.hocakworak.com/archive/2001/WL%202001%2010-24/HW-011024-3.htm The Broken Promise
On the wall next to Elouise Cobell's desk is a blown-up reproduction of a famous Peanuts cartoon strip. After Lucy assures Charlie Brown, "Trust me," she once again snatches away the football he's about to kick, and he ends up flat on his back.
"I decided to stop being Charlie Brown," Cobell told me for her, "Lucy" is the U.S. Government. Now 55, barely 5 feet 4, a wife and a mother, Cobell is a member of the Blackfeet Indian tribe sequestered in the northwest corner of Montana. As a result of a lawsuit she filed on behalf of her fellow Native Americans, they finally are about to collect a staggering sum of money--as much as $40 billion--from Washington.
Losing (or stealing) Native American trusthttp://maroon.uchicago.edu/viewpoints/articles/2005/05/19/losing_or_stealing_n.php For over a century, the Individual Indian Money (IIM) trust has snatched American Indians’ rightful profits by pinching funds from destitute Native nations. An eight-year lawsuit, Cobell v. Norton, aims to make the government pay what they rightfully owe, but, surprise, surprise, the feds can’t even account for the missing funds, and are dragging their feet all the way to the bank. It’s time the government dealt honestly with American Indian nations—if only to try something new.
In the 1880s, the IIM trust was established to collect funds owed to Native peoples for the use of their lands, initiated by the Dawes Act. The act broke up tribal territory into individually owned 80-to-160-acre parcels at the behest of land-hungry settlers, and for the purposes of so-called “detribalization.” To “civilize” them via private property, individual American Indians were given “beneficial ownership” of the plots that, as a sovereign nation, were rightfully theirs; meanwhile, as the parcels’ “trustee,” the government was supposed to manage and distribute revenues collected from the lands back to the Indians who owned them.
Unsurprisingly, the system benefited only the feds. As profits from mining, forestry, and gas extraction continue to pour into IIM, American Indians have seen little of the cash. Under the Bush administration, for instance, the Bureau of Indian Affairs approved lowball deals for oil pipelines on Native property in New Mexico—American Indian recipients got $25 to $40 per rod (a unit for measuring pipeline) while private landowners received anywhere from $140 to $575 per rod. Mishandling of Indian trust funds, however, remains a bipartisan effort: Bill Clinton’s Interior Secretary, Bruce Babbitt, was the first defendant in the Cobell litigation, and was held in contempt of court for stonewalling on court-ordered records.
“It would be difficult to find a more historically mismanaged federal program than the IIM trust,” reads Cobell v. Babbitt, a recent court decision on the subject. The government isn’t even sure how many accounts exist, let alone the amount of cash due to each. What’s more, the situation appears worse than a case of simple bureaucratic incompetence. In May 1999, the U.S. Treasury confessed to destroying 162 boxes of relevant documents on the case, for which they were chastised by a court-appointed Special Master the following December. The Treasury Department clearly took this admonishment to heart when they destroyed a second crop of documents less than a year later.
Until Cobell v. Norton is resolved, Indians won’t see a penny of the money owed them and their nations—a figure estimated to be in the billions. And it looks like the end is nowhere in sight for the suit’s 500,000 plaintiffs. The government has yet to even account for the stolen funds, never mind compensating the plaintiffs. The trust funds are much needed in Native communities, where poverty rates hover around 25 percent.
In 1994, Oklahoma Congressman Mike Synar remarked, “If this was done in the Social Security system, my colleagues, we would have had a war.” The official policy of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, then, is war on American Indian communities. In other words: business as usual.
http://infosecuritymag.techtarget.com/ss/0,295796,sid6_iss446_art918,00.html Broken TrustThe government exposed thousands of Native Americans' financial data to hackers. Elouise Cobell forced the government off the Internet.
BY LAWRENCE WALSH
"Temporarily Unavailable" reads the notice on the Bureau of Indian Affairs Web site. Temporary, in this case, is nearly three years...and counting.
A U.S. District Court judge ordered the Department of the Interior to disconnect from the Internet in 2001 because of concerns raised in a class-action lawsuit filed on behalf of a half-million Native Americans, who are suing the government for mismanaging the Individual Indian Money (IIM) trust fund.
"It's all about broken trust," says Elouise Pepion Cobell, a member of the Blackfeet tribe and the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit (officially known as Cobell v. Norton), which claims the government can't account for as much as $150 billion the fund has collected over the last 117 years.
The disconnection has had an impact. Nearly 10,000 government employees have no Internet or e-mail access and must do business by telephone, snail-mail and fax machines. Interior officials say the ban is driving up operations costs because remote Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) employees can't access online applications; some have to drive long distances just to file paperwork.
Next month, the government will head back to court, seeking to have the order lifted. A reversal is the worst possible outcome for Cobell, who says data security is essential if there's ever to be a full accounting of the trust fund.
The Bureau of Indian Affairs has been "Temporarily Unavailable" since December 2001, when the court ordered it to disconnect until the government demonstrates adequate security.
"The government mandates that financial firms have all sorts of security in place. If they didn't have them, the government would be on them in a New York second," says Cobell, a banker and executive director of the Native American Community Development Corp.