|
As always, job well done by Michael Moore. The movie does a great job in portraying how fucked up the US health care system is compared to other Western industrialized nations. And with the Cuba segment, he did not glorify Cuba or Castro at all. It was portrayed more as an embarrassment as to how this island nation with little wealth, and communist nonetheless, could do so much better than we can. I think Moore's goal with the film is to make the American people ashamed and angry for having such a shitty health care system despite our vast resources.
From an artistic standpoint, the movie seemed choppy. The segments didn't always flow from one to the other very well. But Moore had a lot of ground to cover, so whether better flow was possible, I don't know. I have to watch it again. But since the audience is naturally drawn to the movie because of the topic it covers, perhaps he figured he could sacrifice a little artistic flow in favor of bringing the audience up to speed on areas such as how other countries administer their health care. After all, we have been so brainwashed to think that a government run health care system is soooooooo bad.
And of course, there was classic Michael Moore humor. It is definitely the saving grace to the many depressing scenes in the film.
Out of the trilogy of Bowling for Columbine, Fahrenheit 9/11, and Sicko, I think Sicko will have the biggest impact because of the issue it covers and the timing. All three are outstanding, but in my opinion, I think Bowling for Columbine is Moore's best artistic work because of its exploration of the fear factor, which went on to serve as an anchor to Fahrenheit 9/11 and Sicko. And of course, there's the original with Roger and Me, but I think it belongs in a class of its own because Moore was just starting out and learning the art of film making as he went.
|