Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

And now they have claimed "executive privilege".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:14 AM
Original message
And now they have claimed "executive privilege".
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 10:19 AM by originalpckelly
What complete and utter bullshit.

As long as there is a subpoena or warrant, the enforcement of that, ought not be any different than any other person being subpoenaed before a congressional committee.

To give the President special rights is wrong.

It has been, and it will continue to be.

It will be just as wrong when the next Democratic President does it, if there should be one.

That's why I say we ought to create a pledge for the candidates to sign, much like the tax payers pledge thingy.

It will be a moment of truth. Either they will have to defend executive privilege and come out in favor of it, or they will have to recognize what evils it has brought to our country and come out against it.

"If I should be elected President of the United States of America, I shall not claim executive privilege or any other term synonymous with that one, if I should be subpoenaed by a Congressional committee or if it should be necessary for a civil or criminal investigation of myself or my administration.

This is not to be construed to be a pledge to give up the normal rights of an American citizen to due process under the United States Constitution, it is only a pledge to refuse to claim executive privilege."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Supreme Court has set a precedent
the denied President Clinton executive privilege and had to testify, not just submit papers, he had to testify under oath at a trial. So if they denied a President the right of executive privilege in a civil case, then why would they not have to deny bush and cheney executive privilege when it comes to such high crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That was the Supreme Court, now we have the Extreme Court
Anyone want to say they are even similar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I've been busy...
Wow! DU's like on major traffic mode, I wonder what happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That was BEFORE Scalito and Roberts. Remember.. they are on the court for a REASON...to help these
THUGS further their agenda. There's no way in hell this current SCOTUS is going to vote against the psychos who put them on the bench. It's just NOT going to happen. Precedent will mean NOTHING to those assholes. It would be another 5-4 vote in favor of the THUGS. Remember who we're dealing with here. Scalito and Roberts were chosen from the Federalist Society and GROOMED for this. This is what they've been foaming at the mouth to do....and will. They will support the thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. exactly, I couldn't have stated it better! - Dems, weak-weak-weak!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC