|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 09:58 PM Original message |
WOW Clinton praised Libby back in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. Of course he did, he's crooked like Bush is, though of course... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I K & R'ed this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Exactly "big dog's" DLC provides us "little people" a more kinder and gentler transition to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. It sucks too, I used to idolize Bill Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. You're not alone. I wanted to believe that he was not corrupt but I've learned much different. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 06:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
54. I never idolized Clinton but had great hopes. Then he bacame the best Republican President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. What I think is the most critical thing about Clinton and his triangulating, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
5. My, How Incestuous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. It's all damn interesting. And you know who investigated the pardon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
8. I consider the Rich pardon to be far worse than anything done in the Monicagate deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage for Order (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. He sold the pardon for $2 million, if i remember correctly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. There's More To It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
24. In the tax profession the pardon was seen as overdue as it was a GOP political WITCHHUNT as 60 other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage for Order (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #24 |
66. I don't think he came right out and said it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
9. Was that before Libby obstructed justice and covered this admin's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. As far as you know,,,,,,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
21. As far as I know - oh fer fux sack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. I hear ya - nobody here wants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. A statement on "company you keep" is referring to Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #23 |
62. I just made an observation about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. Good post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
13. Yes, they take care of each other. That's why we have to take care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
15. WTF are you talking about? Where does it say Clinton "praised" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Huh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. not exactly "praise" to note that Libby was both GOP and a high priced lawyer in a world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. "distinguished Republican lawyer" isn't "praise". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KAZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:55 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Why don't you hear some place else. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. We're not going to let you corporate kiss asses take over our party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. And what does that have to do with this thread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Not very tolerant of free speech are we?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:55 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. The "distinguished" sanskritwarrior is correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:04 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. It was Libby's reputation that "disguished" him, not Clinton. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
48. standing above others in attainment - yep - that does seem to fit n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. Not in this sense. It is simply a statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:06 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:10 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. NO! NOT opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 01:57 AM Response to Reply #43 |
52. Forgive me if I believe my opinion is valid over your objections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 09:01 AM Response to Reply #52 |
59. You can believe the world is 6000 years old if you like, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. Exactly, it is just like in the Senate, when Senators refer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:11 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 10:20 AM Response to Reply #28 |
63. The word "praised" is very misleading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. On DU tonight telling a lie so as to bash Clinton seems the rule - this thread is just another one n |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KAZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. Over and over again. Good "cred" building seems to.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 08:55 AM Response to Reply #26 |
57. BINGO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. I believe you. Am I on the right site? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. You need to check yourself and look at my post history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KAZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. "but not anymore". Oh no! What will we do! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Yeah a 6 month run......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KAZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:17 PM Response to Reply #38 |
47. Oh, you just learned of Bill's "support" of Libby. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 08:55 AM Response to Reply #38 |
58. Like glass since post one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:16 PM Response to Reply #30 |
45. You may want to read up on the pardons that were granted rather than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:28 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. Exactly! Hillary is my last choice, but I'm not going to spew RW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 09:11 AM Response to Reply #50 |
60. I agree - the GOP will claim a raid on the Treasury as they oppose federal financing - but that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:17 PM Response to Reply #30 |
46. Why in hell would THIS make you change your mind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 08:45 AM Response to Reply #15 |
56. It doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
18. Oligarchs (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phrogman (940 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
22. Well Duh...Slick Willy's Daddy Bush's buddy-buddy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
29. The enemy of my enemy is my friend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #29 |
42. Clenis Envy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
49. What a flyrtap of fucking idiots in this thread! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-06-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Welcome! I see you got caught, too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 05:42 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Yes Citizen, stay blind to The Clintons' corruption: Play Fleetwood Mac and party like it's 1995 ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 09:15 AM Response to Reply #53 |
61. Jeez! Once again, I'm not blind to the faults of the Clinton's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 10:33 AM Response to Reply #61 |
64. Again, it's not The Left or The Right, it's corporatist cronyism that's trashing our country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. Whoa! Whoa! Whoa! Did you even READ my post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
65. All the Clinton's want is power--they aren't as bad as the Bush's but they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hideboh (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
67. Is this really matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Clinton was not impeached for criminal acts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC