Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any lawyers here? I have a question about "fraud"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
firefox_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:06 PM
Original message
Any lawyers here? I have a question about "fraud"
My aunt revealed to me yesterday that she has given over 1K during the last two years to a religious web site that takes money for delivering "powerful prayers" to deal with some bad circumstances in her life. Naturally, things have not gotten better. Of course, she's an idiot for having fallen for that, but she's very superstitious. Any idea if she would have any chance of winning a lawsuit? Isn't that fraud? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. No chance. Caveat emptor.
That's what I always tell the fruitcakes who try to bait me.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Caveat emptor is not a defense to fraud. It's an alternative and opposing
Edited on Sun Jul-08-07 08:45 PM by BullGooseLoony
legal theory to having warranties on purchases, and has largely been pushed out of the law anyway.

A fraud action here would rest its case on the possible fact that there was a knowing misrepresentation regarding the prayers made with the intent to induce reliance. That was never allowed, even when caveat emptor ruled the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not sure I understand...
Do you mean that if those guys can show that they REALLY believe in prayer and are just asking to be paid for the time they spend praying than things are OK? But if they don't believe in prayer and this is just a way of making money it's fraud instead? How about Scientology?... Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Things may have been worse, the prayers may have helped!
I just came across this today. Surprisingly relevant to your question. You may want to check it out...

The greatest optical illusion:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=807885014283530747&hl=en
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. It depends on the tactics used. And your state's laws. The facts are determinant.
It might be difficult, but it will all turn on the facts, and perhaps the consumer protection laws in your state. If they promised to pray for her - probably no chance. If they promised results - you've got a shot. How much is "over 1K?" Just over $1,000? If she is 'very superstitious,' she may need more than to worry about losing a grand. And you might want to look into a guardianship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, I'm wondering about her mental health...
But I'm not religious, I have NO IDEA whether religious people routinely give these amounts of money for prayers and whatnot. I'll ask her for the site name and look into it though. I bet they're very sneaky and promised nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Next will be the lottery tickets.
It isn't just about religion or religious people.
And it is absolutely logical in a certain way,
as she gets older, she has less to lose by taking high-risk high-payoff bets.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'd say that sounds about right.
But remember that reliance on a misrepresentation must be reasonable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. The state's consumer laws, or any telephone solicitation or similar
laws, would be the place to start.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC