|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:27 PM Original message |
Is there ANY chance that Pelosi will seek to impeach because of Cindy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bentcorner (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. No, of course not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
2. Cindy Sheehan has no bearing on Pelosi's decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. I don't think solely because of Cindy, but I think if enough pressure is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
4. No, actually Cindy makes it MORE difficult for Pelosi to change her mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. That's your opinion; can you prove that sweepiing statement? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. I think what aquart means is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. I think everyone would benefit from ignoring what Faux says. They're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
28. It's not just FOX, it's talk radio. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Of course, you're right there. I had the misfortune to have to listen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. People. FAUX is going to spin anything against the Dems. Stop making |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
30. "Waahh! They're being mean to me!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A wise Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
44. I see that a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. that's just a hit-and-run statement. I fully support her decision to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Because it would look like she is supporting it for political reasons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 03:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
34. exactly my interpretation too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. I agree that it makes it harder for Pelosi to support impeachment, if it blatantly looks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 08:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
51. i doubt it. if anything nancy will hopefully OPEN HER EYES and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. Of course not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
7. If Cindy runs she gets my money. Pelosi will certainly notice if lots more people do the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalkydem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
8. Is she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
10. If Cindy can convince more Reps to support it, perhaps...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
11. No. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
12. It is not within Pelosi's power to impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. "they do not have dictatorial powers" - What did the (R)'s do during the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Where did you read that Pelosi has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. it may have been on a podcast. I think I know which one and want to listen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. You are wrong. The 410-4 vote came before judiciary hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #12 |
38. Oh please.. political reality means nothing to some here.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
15. Impeach, sure. Because of Cindy?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
17. Pelosi will "change" her mind on impeachment regardless of Cindy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
19. Chance of impeachment: slim to none |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
20. Zero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
22. That, and the fact that High Crimes have been committed. Cindy is doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
23. No...not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
29. None whatsoever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
31. I don't want.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
32. I support ANYONE in pressuring our representatives to impeach! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
35. She should step aside in shame and apologize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
36. Can somebody give me a reason... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. No. No one can do that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 04:05 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. I can! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 05:56 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. 39 - 52% is much more than the Nixon effort had. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Please start a thread on this. I would like to know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 03:50 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. I really don't think there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 05:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
48. Without the Senate votes it's another of an endless line of empty gestures? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
41. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
43. Unfortunately, no. Pelosi & Co are playing for 2008. Not now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
45. No why would it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blues90 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
49. I doubt it , if Pelosi won't do it by the peoples demands , then why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 08:41 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. I've been hearing a lot of talk about "no elections" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blues90 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 02:17 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. You would think so . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
53. No. Pelosi is probably laughing at Cindy Sheehan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 10th 2024, 08:02 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC