|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Philosoraptor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:41 AM Original message |
What's so wrong about buying sex? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. Kick for seeing that subject line first thing after logging on - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:45 AM Response to Original message |
2. I thought it was "dead hooker or live boy" in the parlance of problematic discoveries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:52 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. For repugs everything is a commodity to be bought and sold. Much easier to buy sex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theHandpuppet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:50 AM Response to Original message |
3. I have to admit, I don't see what the big deal is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matsubara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:51 AM Response to Original message |
4. It's not wrong, but it is hypocritical for a family values repug... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:52 AM Response to Original message |
5. BUT, BUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MessiahRp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:54 AM Response to Original message |
7. Prostitution probably should be legal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. During the Civil War |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:57 AM Response to Original message |
8. Well, it makes you a buysexual! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomreedtoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:00 AM Response to Original message |
9. Well, basically, prostitution is slavery. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MessiahRp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:38 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. If you take a pimp out of an equation... how is it slavery? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomreedtoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. If you took the wheels off a car, it would roll smoother? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:01 AM Response to Original message |
10. Most people who sell their bodies for sex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawaii Hiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:49 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Your generalizations are off base |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:16 AM Response to Original message |
11. I once told a Repuke politician that he should be in favor of legalizing prostitution... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:19 AM Response to Original message |
12. It's not a big deal. The hypocrisy is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
16. It shouldn't be a big deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
17. Nothing - if you're not married. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boobooday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
18. All Americans pay for Republican sex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
20. The second formulation of Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC