|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 04:38 PM Original message |
A quick attempt to end stupidity (re Sheehan) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well done! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Well this dropped like a rock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm going to wait until she officially declares. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Wait to do what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 04:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. aha, read editing. That changes things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
6. Kick. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
7. She has every right to run for office. She IS an American!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I'm waiting for the usual trolls and DLCdrones to show up here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. I dont' think one needs to spin to ask "why not challenge in the primary race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Because it's meaningless from a national media perspective? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
35. I don't think the media strategy is a good one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:51 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. Well, I'm not sure if it is or not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:02 PM Response to Reply #45 |
81. Nancy will not be "forced" to do anything. This is a ridiculous notion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. Okay, maybe not force... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:13 PM Response to Reply #87 |
92. I would venture to guess she's working on that in spite of Cindy Sheehan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whopis01 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #18 |
52. um... maybe because she is NOT a Democrat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #52 |
71. I don't think that "prevents" it as she can do what is necessary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whopis01 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #71 |
151. She is not a Democrat and is under no obligation to become one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 02:19 PM Response to Reply #151 |
154. And I am under no obligation to support her run as an Independent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whopis01 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #154 |
155. correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
27. Wow. If someone disagrees, They are troll or DLC drone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Yes. On this issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:21 PM Response to Reply #30 |
95. I checked the other place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:27 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. Possibly because they are idiots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #99 |
106. They say they love watching us all fight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:50 PM Response to Reply #30 |
111. Good Analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:47 PM Response to Reply #30 |
138. Why would one need numbers for an opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 10:07 PM Response to Reply #138 |
142. Well, if your opinion is that she represents some sort of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #142 |
143. No, that is not my opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 12:46 AM Response to Reply #143 |
144. Then you don't disagree with my OP, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 01:01 AM Response to Reply #144 |
145. Mostly a reaction to the "Waiting for the trolls" comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 10:31 AM Response to Reply #145 |
149. If you spread lies to stir up trouble, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #30 |
152. Either That, Or Your Premise Is Just Of Narrow Mind And Limited Perception. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 08:53 AM Response to Reply #152 |
156. Oh I thought you already "exposed" me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #156 |
158. You've Exposed Yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #158 |
160. All this talk of exposing, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
94. If there are any trolls here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:28 PM Response to Reply #94 |
101. Unsophisticated trolls try to change opinion, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #101 |
107. Exactly n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #107 |
109. And... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #109 |
119. The trolls aren't interested in DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #119 |
122. Deleted message |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 12:09 PM Response to Reply #119 |
153. EXACTLY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
113. In other words, you're waiting for a discussion on a discussion board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:15 PM Response to Reply #113 |
130. That would be a long wait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #130 |
135. Frankly, I hadn't seen that argument until you popped up to put an end to it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:40 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. The argument is implied every time someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
9. If an Inde runs the Republicans may invest more heavilly, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Well, if she loses 50,000 votes to someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Didn't Nader "send a message?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Nader didn't help (at all), but he was hardly the decisive factor in the 2000 debacle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #21 |
33. I disagree about Nader, but agree with the rest of your post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
98. The message the Democrats got from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #98 |
105. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. One house seat vs. POTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #24 |
34. Did you agree with their plan to target Wellstone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:46 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. Wasn't paying attention, not my state. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
79. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:07 PM Response to Reply #24 |
85. If they can win and not just split the progressive vote in the biggies, fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Wow, that's a new low. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Nader WAS a factor and he gloated about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:44 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. Explain exactly how he swung the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:56 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. They competed for the same voters. No Bushie was likely to switch to Nader; some Gore voters were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:31 PM Response to Reply #49 |
64. You seem to forget that the Florida election ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:37 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. jgraz's argument is that Nader wasn't a factor. I'll agree he was a minimal factor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:45 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:48 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Deleted message |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:57 PM Response to Reply #70 |
76. Let's see how many ridiculous hyperboles we can get out of jpgray, shall we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:00 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. I'm sorry, my hyper-anal decoder ring reads "Nader was NOT a factor" to mean "Nader wasn't a factor" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #78 |
86. Transference, thy name is jpgray |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:11 PM Response to Reply #86 |
90. I was perfectly polite in disagreement until you started to claim I was a lazy uninformed jackass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #90 |
136. I need more coffee. For a minute there I thought the same guy was arguing with himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:28 PM Response to Reply #70 |
100. If everything else was the same but Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 10:53 AM Response to Reply #100 |
159. Pay no attention to the stacked Supreme Court behind the curtain! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:55 PM Response to Reply #64 |
74. And Nader assisted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:54 PM Response to Reply #41 |
73. Sure Nader got 97,421 votes and roughly 70% of Nader voters said they would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:05 PM Response to Reply #73 |
83. Gore could have gotten those 537 votes from any number of places |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:12 PM Response to Reply #83 |
91. I'm not letting ANYONE off the hook, Nader included. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:16 PM Response to Reply #83 |
93. Ah, so it was the Democrats' focus on Nader that made him a factor. Or is that more hyperbole? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #93 |
97. You really don't have much in your life, do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:34 PM Response to Reply #97 |
102. Based on search, you've posted in three pages more GD threads than I have since June |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:39 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. Claiming someone who competed for the same votes as Gore wasn't a factor is purest idiocy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:43 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Have you actually done any research on that election, outside of reading DU posts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. You have proof that Nader had zero impact on Gore? I'm all ears |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:21 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. "proof" that nader had "zero" impact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. Your claim wasn't that other factors hurt Gore, your claim was that Nader didn't. At all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. You're being childish and silly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:47 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. By your logic, minority voter suppression wasn't a factor, because Diebold and SCOTUS stole 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:57 PM Response to Reply #68 |
75. "Many factors hurt Gore. Nader was one of them." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #57 |
103. Looks like finger pointing to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Somehow I don't believe Madame Speaker is losing too much sleep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I don't either. And, I don't think Cindy's strategy is serving her well in this case? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. What's that saying about "closed minds"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I'm open minded, I like Cindy, but I fear she's losing credibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
118. Her so-called "supporters" don't seem to care about that...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 09:24 PM Response to Reply #118 |
140. I think Lincoln may have had the same critics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 09:10 AM Response to Reply #14 |
148. You would know...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. 84%!! Support. That's why I kicked this thread. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
13. It's safe to challenge Pelosi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
17. Very true. It's more likely to resemble the SF mayoral race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #17 |
38. In many ways you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:52 PM Response to Reply #17 |
114. Gavin nearly lost that race. And in fact, he may have lost it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
22. thanks for this!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
23. In 10 re-elections, Pelosi has had an avg of 75% (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishnfla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
26. then whats the point? she aint gonna win nor prove shit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:29 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Put a scare in her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftupnorth (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:32 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Yeah, I don't think ANY member of elected office should feel TOO safe in their seat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishnfla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:39 PM Response to Reply #28 |
37. Now thats real smart!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:50 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. Yeah, that thinkin's real hard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #43 |
53. The only other mainstream option is Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. Very hard to argue with that reasoning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. "stupid is as stupid does" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
39. Maybe Sheehan should seek the Peace and Freedom nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blues90 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
44. I feel Cindy has the right to do what she needs to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philosophie_en_rose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
46. Is San Francisco the capital city of slavery, taxes, and war, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:01 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. Whoosh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:19 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. I think that was a reference to San Fran being a Democratic stronghold. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 09:07 PM Response to Reply #56 |
139. Oh, I get it now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
47. I just don't understand why she isn't running as a Dem in the primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:59 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. I don't either, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:56 PM Response to Reply #50 |
117. She can't win Pelosi's district |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blues90 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:14 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. She did say in her letter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. Well, we need more progressives IN the Democratic party. *sigh* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:29 PM Response to Reply #54 |
63. IMO it would be a mistake to run as a Green |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #54 |
82. "Be the change you seek.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #47 |
120. Did you miss her screed against the Democratic Party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buck Rabbit (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 09:35 PM Response to Reply #120 |
141. She seems to have become an Anarchist or Libertarian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 09:08 AM Response to Reply #141 |
147. I've been told by one of her big supporters.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
55. You can call me a troll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. You're a troll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. I'll only call you a troll if you spread the ridiculous meme |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
69. Running against a Democrat who voted "NO" on IWR? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:59 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. Maybe Cindy could run against a DINO or a Republican, since... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:02 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. Where she would get maybe 1-3% of the vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:11 PM Response to Reply #80 |
89. If the anti-war/impeachment supporters are so numerous... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:23 PM Response to Reply #89 |
96. She is a typical Bay Area person, so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #96 |
112. I don't think she will campaign as well as you claim... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:56 PM Response to Reply #112 |
116. People want people like themselves as candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:00 PM Response to Reply #116 |
121. Which was a factor in Bush 43 and Reagan becoming president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:02 PM Response to Reply #121 |
123. You know, I would probably vote for Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:16 PM Response to Reply #123 |
131. It's certainly possible. Her idealism and earnestness are admirable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:02 PM Response to Reply #116 |
124. Here are some juicy tidbits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:06 PM Response to Reply #124 |
126. I don't entirely disagree with any of those statements, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:18 PM Response to Reply #126 |
132. That's too bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:23 PM Response to Reply #132 |
134. "Idiot" was my paraphrase |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:06 PM Response to Reply #77 |
84. Nancy Pelosi is a liberal Dem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:09 PM Response to Reply #84 |
88. She voted against the war, putting her to the left of most of Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #88 |
104. Ending the war and impeaching the criminals who started it is the wrong cause? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:52 PM Response to Reply #104 |
115. Attempting to unseat the only person able to impeach & end the war is wrong, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:07 PM Response to Reply #115 |
127. Maybe you have forgotten that Pelosi took impeachment off the table? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:12 PM Response to Reply #127 |
129. So did Jim Moran (VA-8). And now he supports it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:21 PM Response to Reply #129 |
133. When Pelosi comes out in favor of impeachment, let me know, okay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #84 |
150. Beyond impeachment, how is she not a liberal Dem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
108. I don't even think Sheehan is worth arguing over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:49 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. Her campaign will play differently in SF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #110 |
125. Not when seniority and the Speaker's gavel are in play. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
128. Thank you for the perspective. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 05:35 AM Response to Original message |
146. Karma time for Nancy. She can avoid losing the race by doing the right thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
157. heh heh heh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC