Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I stay, says royal row BBC boss

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
demoleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 01:34 AM
Original message
I stay, says royal row BBC boss
Source: BBC

BBC One controller Peter Fincham has said he is not planning to resign over the Queen documentary blunder.

Mr Fincham spoke out after journalists were allowed to see a television trailer which appeared to show the Queen storming out of a photo shoot.

The programme trailer showed the Queen in an exchange with photographer Annie Leibovitz, followed by a clip of her apparently walking off.

The BBC said the trailer was never intended to be seen by the public or the press and was shown to journalists "in error".



Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6896892.stm



I had posted the fact in the Lounge yesterday, just for fun and curiosity. I never thought the English could make so serious a thing out of that!
"Papers feast on BBC royal apology", it's a news title from BBC! Here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6896871.stm

My post, yesterday, http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=105&topic_id=6710322&mesg_id=6710322

You know what? It was a good chance for the Queen to appear in a different light. She failed.

What mostly surprises me is that UK media and Windsor, with a current diplomatic crisis with Russia and a thousand problems at home, find this royal "accident" so devastating.

Jesus, the world is exploding! Does anyone want to tell Her Majesty?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lese majeste.
Edited on Fri Jul-13-07 01:41 AM by aquart
"Lèse majesté (French expression, from the Latin Laesa maiestas or Laesae maiestatis (crimen), (crime of) injury to the Majesty; in English, also lese majesty or leze majesty) is the crime of violating majesty, an offence against the dignity of a reigning sovereign or against a state.

This behaviour was first classified as a criminal offence against the dignity of the Roman republic in Ancient Rome. In time, as the Emperor became identified with the Roman state (the empire never formally became a monarchy), it was essentially applied to offences against his person.<1> Though legally the princeps civitatis (his official title, roughly 'first citizen') could never become a sovereign, as the republic was never abolished, emperors were to be deified as divus, first posthumously but ultimately while reigning, and thus enjoyed the legal protection provided for the divinities of the pagan state cult; by the time it was exchanged for Christianity, the monarchical tradition in all but name was well established (an example of the way the Roman religion was made to serve the political elite).

Narrower conceptions of offences against Majesty as offences against the crown predominated in the European kingdoms that emerged in the early mediaeval period. In feudal Europe, various real crimes were classified as lèse majesté even though not intentionally directed against the crown, such as counterfeiting because coins bear the monarch's effigy and/or coat of arms.

However, since the disappearance of absolute monarchy, this is viewed as less of a crime, although similar, more malicious acts, could be considered treason. By analogy, as modern times saw republics emerging as great powers, a similar crime may be constituted, though not under this name, by any offence against the highest representatives of any state ( e.g. all heads of state, regardless of their title, as in Belgium)."

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lese-majeste>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. "The Royals"....
a superfluous, antiquated drain on the people of the U.K, serving no real purpose other than to hold on to a ludicrous tradition that should have died out long ago. They've lost all touch with reality and should go the way of the buggy whip. That pretentious old woman should be put out to pasture to fend for herself. My guess is she'd perish within days with no one to wait on her hand and foot.

They think they're entitled to treat others like shit just because of who their parents were. Let me assure her royal hyena-ass that her shit DOES stink and she's no better than the lowliest rag-picker on the streets of London. That woman and her inbred family need a heaping dose of reality smacked right in between their eyes.

As you can probably tell I'm not a big fan of that disrespectful, dried up old hag and that gaggle of inbred leeches she calls "The Royal Family". :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. What a gut busting.......
Misery loves company but such eloquent abhorrence for the establishment makes me almost want to pop in that sci-fi classic Braveheart :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. A good comment on this from "As A Dodo", the parody obituary blog
A worried nation was today gathered before the gates of Buckingham Palace, awaiting news of The Queen's Loss of Sang Froid, which is understood to have passed away yesterday during an official statement from the British Broadcasting Corporation.
...
All present were so horrified by the result - which seemed to reveal Her Majesty the Queen acting in a manner more befitting of a mere human being than a head of state(1) - that they immediately ran off to their editors and producers demanding that front pages be cleared and tops of the bulletins be emptied to make space for their astonishing and vital news story.
...
The Queen's Loss of Sang Froid is survived by a media that thinks it is a scandal to suggest Her Majesty might have a hissy fit but sees no problem whatsoever with suggesting that MMR causes autism, global warming is not manmade, wi-fi technology can cause allergies and that the best solution to illness and disease is a couple of drops of water from a homoeopath or a diet based solely on walnuts and chinchilla droppings.

http://asadodo.blogspot.com/2007/07/queens-loss-of-sang-froid-11-july-2007.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demoleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not bad!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Henny Penny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I remember when you could trust the beeb...
or at least thought you could.

But now not even Blue Peter is to be believed....

The end is nigh...I tells ye....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demoleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. To the good ol' days, then!
:toast:

:hi: from Italy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC