|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 06:48 AM Original message |
Priest seeks dropping of molestation charges because they happened a long time ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatorick73 (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 06:55 AM Response to Original message |
1. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
2. The crime was committed, he needs to be tried for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 10:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
18. the statue of limitations is not a terrible idea actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. I agree but I also know that 'Church Law' and the Laws of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 05:49 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. if there isn't sufficient "evidence" the priest has nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 07:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. Check out this morning's BBC Front page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 07:13 AM Response to Original message |
4. From the depths of the Abby St.Giles, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
5. There are legitimate reasons for a statute of limitations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 08:36 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. that is true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 09:11 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. the solution I lean toward is permitting civil suits but not criminal cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 09:46 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I don't see that as a viable solution. Being taken to the cleaners financially because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 10:41 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. civil has always had easier standards than criminal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 11:20 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Leaving case specifics out, when considering the concept of statute of limitations... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. The Diocese in Tucson divested its self of most assets to avoid civil penalties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. There is no excuse for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. No, it wasn't moral, it was CYA bigtime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
6. Fair enough.Stop bringing up Jesus then,as long we're talking shelf life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 09:53 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. LOL! Well said! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I can't take any credit.It was the late,great Bill Hicks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Love it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
14. Um.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
17. And now in AZ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-15-07 10:52 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. "I'd really like to find a way to close its doors" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 05:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC