Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mother responds to letter of son's killer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 12:46 AM
Original message
Mother responds to letter of son's killer
Mother responds to letter of son's killer
BY SUE HOY-ELLIOTT, Contributing writer | Monday, Jul 16 2007 9:05 PM

Last Updated: Monday, Jul 16 2007 9:09 PM

Editor's note: On Friday we published a letter of apology from Nick Woodall, who was convicted in 1988 of the murder of Michael Hoy.

We failed to contact the victim's family before publishing it. A response from Hoy's mother appears below.

We regret any pain the publication of this piece caused Hoy's family and I apologize for it.

-- Mike Jenner, executive editor

Once again The Californian has demonstrated callous disregard by printing the purported apology letter from the man who bludgeoned to death Michael Hoy, my son, in October 1987.

The editor's note above this abomination refers to "Californian archives." Those archives could not possibly have been thoroughly searched or the letter I wrote to the Probation Department before Michael's murderer's sentencing and quoted in The Californian on April 7, 1988 edition would have been found.

It is clear that The Californian made no attempt to contact us in any way prior to bludgeoning our hearts, while a cold blooded murderer had his ten minutes in the spotlight!

We are relieved that Michael's murderer's attempts to contact us have failed and pray that security net will remain in place if anyone at The Californian still knows the meanings of integrity and confidentiality.

http://www.bakersfield.com/hourly_news/story/190298.html

Note to Mods - I included more than 4 paragraphs as the apology from the paper is separate from the article/letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC