Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Delusional David Brooks Enters Bush’s ‘Universe,’ Walks Away Entranced By *'s ‘Self-Confidence’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:46 AM
Original message
Delusional David Brooks Enters Bush’s ‘Universe,’ Walks Away Entranced By *'s ‘Self-Confidence’
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/17/brooks-bobo-bush/

David Brooks Enters Bush’s ‘Universe,’ Walks Away Entranced By President’s ‘Self-Confidence’

brookshands.jpgDescribing it as an encounter that was “like entering a different universe,” New York Times columnist David Brooks recounts a recent conversation he had with President Bush in the White House. In the editorial entitled “Heroes and History,” Brooks writes:

I left the 110-minute session thinking that far from being worn down by the past few years, Bush seems empowered. His self-confidence is the most remarkable feature of his presidency.

110 minutes with Bush, and all Brooks appears to be able to offer his readers is a superficial diagnosis of Bush’s psychology that any right-wing pundit on Fox News could render. In his last column, Brooks wrote: “I figured that sometime between now and September the White House would be so isolated that it would have to launch withdrawal plans. But ending a war is as complicated as starting one. In order to wind up the Iraq conflict there has to be some general agreement about how to do it. We’re nowhere close to that.”

Presented with an opportunity in a meeting with Bush to determine where this “general agreement” might lie, Brooks uselessly offers that Bush “feels no need to compromise to head off opposition from Capitol Hill and is confident that he can rebuild popular support. ‘I have the tools,’ he said.” (This was one of only two quotes Brooks managed to gather from a 110 minute session.)

Enamored with Bush’s self-confidence, Brooks writes of the two sources from which it flows:

The first is his unconquerable faith in the rightness of his Big Idea. Bush is convinced that history is moving in the direction of democracy <…>

Second, Bush remains energized by the power of the presidency. Some presidents complain about the limits of the office. But Bush, despite all the setbacks, retains a capacious view of the job and its possibilities.

In an effort to head off the obvious criticism over his panderific column, Brooks argues, “Bush is not blind to the realities in Iraq.” His evidence? Bush “lives through” difficult moments: “the trips to Walter Reed, the hours and hours spent weeping with or being rebuffed by the families of the dead.”

To hear Brooks say this, one might forget that thousands of Americans and Iraqis live painful personal trials of the same sort each day, and many of them have to the self-confident realization that the war needs to end. And where Brooks had an opportunity with Bush to shatter some illusions about the future course in Iraq, Brooks opted instead to reinforce the neoconservative faith in the “rightness of his Big Idea.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. can I do this now
:puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
2.  "Bringing Democracy Through War" is a Big INSANE Idea. Not to mention Bush HATES DEMOCRACY.
Edited on Tue Jul-17-07 09:49 AM by WinkyDink
But then, the "Big Idea" REALLY is "A Bushco-Dominated World Economy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. The "big idea" has many in its grasp
How many 2008 dems will cut and run in defeat from Iraq?
None.
They will offer a 'smarter' way to 'win' (the)/(Bush's) war.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danieljay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. In other words, Brooks AND Bush are delusional. How nice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. It Is The Confidence That Comes From Having Absolute Power
Bush** isn't leaving. You think we're going to have an election next year? Think again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonkatoy57 Donating Member (443 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. I liked this part
"Some presidents complain about the limits of the office. But Bush, despite all the setbacks, retains a capacious view of the job and its possibilities."

No shit. When you insist that the president can do whatever the fuck he wants, add almost 800 signing statement to completed legislation, and feel no compunction about telling aides and former aides to refuse to comply with supoenas issued by congressional committees, why shouldn't you have a capacious view of your job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. How did he walk away AT ALL?
I would assume that taking your leave is difficult when you superglue your lips to some nice juicy BushButt and other naughty bits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. May I make a suggestion?
Instead of reading more delusional rantings from David Brooks, why doesn't everyone take a look at this Vanity Fair article:

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/08/halberstam200708

David Halberstam (RIP) hit the proverbial nail on the head with this piece.

David Brooks is an asshat extraordinaire. Too bad he didn't die in a car accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Excellent article! It's been posted on DU numerous times, so I hope
a lot of people read it.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. Our Miss Brooks: always good for a laugh or two
To read David Brooks is to wonder how naive an adult can be and still function in the modern world.

Brooks must have a full-time, 24/7 handler walking alongside him to make sure he doesn't trip over his own shoelaces or lose his milk money in a game of Three-Card Monte.

A few years ago in one of his columns, Brooks marveled at that newfangled invention, e-mail. He actually claimed it was returning courtship to "the Victorian era, where couples engaged in lengthy correspondence" bla-bla-bla.

I guess nobody had the heart to tell Brooks that many lengthy e-mail correspondences are people corresponding with OTHER PEOPLE'S SPOUSES. And that they often don't have an exactly Victorian ending.

:rofl:

Jeez, I first heard about an internet-caused divorce around 1995 or '96. I wonder if David Brooks has heard about such a thing yet.

Totally worthless as a "journalist." Another lightweight who only has a job because he's willing to peddle right-wing propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. All megalomaniacs are "confident". It's their hallmark, duh. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC