|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:29 AM Original message |
Is nuclear energy a solution to global warming? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
1. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
2. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
3. Not really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
4. NO...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
5. What do you see as the benefits to warrant another look? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
6. Japan probably doesn't think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
7. Certainly the new 4th generational thorium gas cooled reactors would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
8. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
9. NO , not a solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
10. Al Gore doesn't think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:41 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. "I am not opposed to nuclear power" -- Al Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:55 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. "As a result of all these problems, I believe that nuclear reactors will only play a limited role." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. "The main reason ... is not the problem of waste disposal or the danger of reactor operator error" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
11. Yep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:48 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. All waste materials can be recycled? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. It's hardly the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greenman3610 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. I've "tracked" the nuclear waste in my state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. William Clark, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
12. Unless the waste can be dealt with, NO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
14. Only if a solution for nuclear waste comes with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baby_mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
15. Yes, although it'll only be a temporary solution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
19. Look at France. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
20. I ask this question today because I think that GE is pushing this on our side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Here's the special MSNBC did on nuclear energy: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
21. right up to the point at which someone says, "oops!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC