I have a problem about the Plame case

In Congressional testimony Issa accused Joe Wilson and his wife Valerie of perjury. This accusation was a matter of public record and was left unchallenged. Why? Is there substance to it or ??? Why did no one ask for official charges to be filed or a public apology from Issa? Because no one objected to his accusation I wonder if there is something to it..If not why would they allow it to stand, especially in the official Congressional testimony? It would be one thing if this was stated by Limbaugh or such but it was in official Congressional testimony.. Something doesn't ring true here...

Just wondering -- I would venture to guess that it would be his comments that don't ring true.

They're ignoring him.

Is something one would just ignore. :shrug: I sure wouldn't just ignore it anyway.

Therefore, they go unchallenged...by the media and by our other Representatives.

That would be unusual. I think perhaps Issa was questioning somebody else under oath, Mrs. Wilson, for example, and took the opportunity to make some false accusations to further the righwing bullshit campaign. I think he can and did say whatever he felt like saying without any danger of perjury charges.

:shrug:

I was not very plain I guess but you were exactly correct except it was Joe Wilson and not Valerie that was being questioned. My bitch is it is still uncontested in the Record. That gives it at least some weight.

Wilson: I find it an outrage to find a Representative accuse me or my wife of perjury, they cannot count on members of President’s party to further defame them.

Have you bothered to check your facts? I did, and you are simply wrong on the facts. Wilson immediately and forcefully objected to Issa's smear. Conyers dismissed him as a stooge. Issa stormed out.

I'm sorry I missed that.

civil suit. It may have been left alone so as to be more efficacious for that purpose.

So the Sneermiester War Profiteer may have to squirm as he spins his lies under oath...

"Issa: Whether we can get more mileage out of disclosure of CIA Agent, we’ve reduced it, I apologize if I feel that this is hypocritical event. If we were having the discussion we should be having, the question of the President’s clemency, should be our inquiry today. All of us together talked about how when Ford restored a certain amount of confidence, pardoning Nixon so the nation could get on with it’s work, not bc it was popular because it allowed the government to move on, it should be taken in the same light. We have had a lot of politics on this for a long time. I hope he believes me at my word, I believe that his wife will soon be asking for a pardon. She has not been genuine in her testimony before Congress, if pursued, Ambassador Wilson and Valerie will be asking to put this behind us. I do not believe this was good use of the Committee’s time. I hope we will have a real debate about proper use of clemency.

Conyers: this is a legitimate part of our oversight. Had the gentleman heard much of the testimony before he arrived, it was about use or misuse of commutation power.

Wilson: before I wrote my article, I spoke to House and Senate Intell Staff, because my objective was for the Admin to tell the truth. My Great Uncle sat in this body. My great uncle, Governor of CA. I find it an outrage to find a Representative accuse me or my wife of perjury, they cannot count on members of President’s party to further defame them.

The Republicans are going nuts.

Conyers: and by the way, we gave Monica Goodling the same courtesy when she came before this Committee.

Wilson: this is yet a further smear of my name and my wife’s good name. The facts of my wife’s participation or lack of participation, one week after the article appeared, made it clear she had no role. Furthermore, the Congressman has said he has read all the information. Let me quote from you from SSCI 2, refers to testimony that should have been in teat report.

Issa walked out."
http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/11/hjc-hearing-on-libbys-get-out-of-jail-free-card-three/#more-10243

Please spare me and everyone else here your concern.

was Issa slinging shit to distract and obstruct during the hearing. They (RePukes) threw out a lot of other crap while they were at it. Typical nonsense from them when they aren't in controll of things.

Isa left. Isa defends Treason should be the Headline!

Busholini said that the Leaker was "likely" in his Admin. but refuses to follow the inquiry as to who commitred Treason. This case is not over by a long shot.

It may have been responded to before?

Something to it? Well her testimony did conflict with the Senate Report of Pre-war Intelligence on Iraq. Republicans like to point that out, that a "bipartisan Select Committee report" found that Valerie was the reason Joe was sent to Niger

While it was in the report it was not in the findings of it, it was not bipartisan, it was not a majority finding.It was in the "additional views" section.

It was a view of three senators...a very partisan minority...Pat Roberts (R-KS), joined by Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Christopher Bond (R-MO).

Republicans keep using that as proof their accusation is true.

Something to it? She wrote a memo. They use that as proof. Her boss says he asked her to write it and there was much other evidence to disprove that minority view.

I'm not sure why Issa's accusations were not responded to on the record this time but they have been addressed many times.

Based on posts above it was clearly and immediately challenged.