Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Police use car's GPS to track hit-and-run suspect

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 08:27 PM
Original message
Police use car's GPS to track hit-and-run suspect
Interesting (or chilling depending on perspective) precedent being set...To sum up the back story, police had a suspect in a hit-and-run killing who was driving a Benz...Police went to M-B and wanted them to use the company's GPS roadside assistance system to track him down; which they steadfastly refused to do...Police also went to the manufacturer of the GPS system, who did cooperate...

=======================

Police: We're Closing In On Hit-And-Run Suspect

(CBS) GLENDALE, Calif. Glendale police believe they are closing in on a driver wanted in connection with a hit-and-run crash that killed a 24-year-old woman, a spokesman said Monday.

The driver, identified as Ara Grigoryan, 20, of Glendale, was identified last week as a "person of interest" in the Tuesday night death of Elizabeth Sandoval.

The car involved in the crash was found Saturday, and work had already been done on the vehicle in an apparent attempt to disguise the damage, said Officer John Balian of the Glendale Police Department.

"Hopefully we will have some news on where he is," Balian said. "I think we are very close."

The vehicle, a 2003 four-door Mercedes-Benz S430, was found Saturday near a Van Nuys body shop.

Balian said police received a call on Saturday from ATX, a GPS location company employed by Mercedes-Benz of America, a New Jersey-based firm.

more at link
http://cbs2.com/topstories/local_story_197223237.html

discussion at autoblog as well
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/mercedes-refuses-to-activate-gps-in-suspects-car/

======================
======================
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lets all get a veri-chip
and be done with it.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Those FBI guys also want to eavesdrop on people who have On Star in their cars.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If they ADMIT that they "want to", then they're already doing it.
FBI has already admitted listening to people by
using their cell phones as bugs. Every current
current cell phone was designed to do that...
even if you think you have it turned off.

Orwell thought SMALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's one reason I'm very happy with my 98 manual everything Honda
Beyond that, almost all my purchases are cash only, I won't even think of EZpass. I haven't trusted my government or business's for a long time, but the last six years have only increased that feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. ttt one time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. So what? The GPS chip is a feature that helps in cases of car theft.
Owners are told about it up front. Hell, it's in the car because owners want it. If you then murder someone suddenly it's bad the cops use it to find you/your car? I don't think so. This is after the crime (murder/manslaughter), so it's certainly not an invasion of privacy now is it? This sets no precedent whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC