|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 03:57 PM Original message |
White House privilege claim ruled ‘not legally valid.’ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Justice is coming to the USA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClayZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Its coming from the sorrow on the street |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Bravo, I can feel it, it's like the light before the dawn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 09:13 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I'm not confident that you're seeing the light before the dawn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 09:06 PM Response to Reply #16 |
32. no, I think that people are waking up from their sleep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 07:50 AM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Nope - Bush just ruled that the Dept of Justice/DAs may not persue contempt charges against Admin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. Right, so they are left with "inherent contempt"... good. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
33. he rules a lot of things, doesn't mean it's real |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pepperbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. from the K to the R! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stirlingsliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
4. Bolton Will Be In Contempt of Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. They need to provide the consequences of those refusing the subpoenas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rndmprsn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. K+R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. naw, they will force it to the supreme court who will rule in thier favor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jelly (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #8 |
20. What would they gain from such precedent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenCommie (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. Long life the rule of law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
10. The WH is spoiling for this to go to SCOTUS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 07:52 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. yup, I am afraid this is what they are doing the same SC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
14. Democrats need to wake up to the fact that the Law is only what Bush* says it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 09:11 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I think you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vilis Veritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
17. So what time do we meet at the barricades? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
montanto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. This is what the second ammendment is for. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vilis Veritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. I hope everyone here knows that I am referring to PEACEFUL... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jahyarain (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. there will NEVER be Peace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vilis Veritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 02:06 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. There might be a small flaw in your reasoning...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
agent46 (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
29. Isn't it getting late? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrainGlutton (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
19. Of course, Sanchez is not a judge, so her "ruling" is only a position statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
21. Produce the documents now Mr. Bolten or go to jail! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
23. So, please explain to me what they will do when Bolten continues to refuse to comply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Precisely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Of course it's going nowhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
30. K&R. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 03:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC