Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

70 Congress Members Sign Letter to Bush: We Will Only Vote for Money to Bring Troops Home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 08:01 PM
Original message
70 Congress Members Sign Letter to Bush: We Will Only Vote for Money to Bring Troops Home
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/24891

70 Congress Members Sign Letter to Bush: We Will Only Vote for Money to Bring Troops Home - Finally Something Done Right!
Submitted by davidswanson on Thu, 2007-07-19 23:06. Congress



Congressional Progressive Caucus
BI-PARTISAN GROUP OF 70 HOUSE MEMBERS PUTS PRESIDENT BUSH ON NOTICE OVER UPCOMING IRAQ APPROPRIATIONS

-Members pledge to use appropriations process to fully fund redeployment from Iraq-

Washington, DC - As public frustration with President Bush’s failed Iraq policy continues to mount, a bi-partisan group of 70 members of Congress asserted their power to use the appropriations process to change the policy in Iraq, directly challenging the President’s claim that Congress’ only power with regard to the conflict is to fund the policy he has set.

Led by Progressive, and Out of Iraq Caucus Chairs Reps. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), Barbara Lee (D-CA), and Maxine Waters (D-CA), 70 House Members today delivered a letter to President Bush putting him on notice that when the Congress takes up the FY ’08 funding for military operations in Iraq in September they will only support appropriating funding for military operations in Iraq that are used to fully fund the safe and orderly redeployment of US troops from Iraq. In their letter, the broad collection of members cited the skyrocketing human and financial costs of the President’s failed Iraq policy and warned that the occupation’s costs will be felt for generations to come:

“We are writing to inform you that we will only support appropriating additional funds for U.S. military operations in Iraq during Fiscal Year 2008 and beyond for the protection and safe redeployment of all our troops out of Iraq before you leave office <…>

“We agree with a clear and growing majority of the American people who are opposed to continued, open-ended U.S. military operations in Iraq, and believe it is unwise and unacceptable for you to continue to unilaterally impose these staggering costs and the soaring debt on Americans currently and for generations to come,” they wrote.

The full text of the letter is below:

Dear Mr. President:

We are writing to inform you that we will only support appropriating additional funds for U.S. military operations in Iraq during Fiscal Year 2008 and beyond for the protection and safe redeployment of all our troops out of Iraq before you leave office.

More than 3,600 of our brave soldiers have died in Iraq. More than 26,000 have been seriously wounded. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been killed or injured in the hostilities and more than 4 million have been displaced from their homes. Furthermore, this conflict has degenerated into a sectarian civil war and U.S. taxpayers have paid more than $500 billion, despite assurances that you and your key advisors gave our nation at the time you ordered the invasion in March, 2003 that this military intervention would cost far less and be paid from Iraqi oil revenues.

We agree with a clear and growing majority of the American people who are opposed to continued, open-ended U.S. military operations in Iraq, and believe it is unwise and unacceptable for you to continue to unilaterally impose these staggering costs and the soaring debt on Americans currently and for generations to come.

Sincerely,

Rep. Lynn Woolsey (CA); Rep. Barbara Lee (CA); Rep. Maxine Waters (CA); Rep. Ellen Tauscher (CA); Rep. Rush Holt (NJ); Rep. Maurice Hinchey (NY); Rep. Diane Watson (CA); Rep. Ed Pastor (AZ); Rep. Barney Frank (MA); Rep. Danny Davis (IL); Rep. John Conyers (MI); Rep. John Hall (NY); Rep. Bob Filner (CA); Rep. Nydia Velazquez (NY); Rep. Bobby Rush (IL); Rep. Charles Rangel (NY); Rep. Ed Towns (NY); Rep. Paul Hodes (NH); Rep. William Lacy Clay (MO); Rep. Earl Blumenauer (OR); Rep. Albert Wynn (MD); Rep. Bill Delahunt (MA); Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC); Rep. G. K. Butterfield (NC); Rep. Hilda Solis (CA); Rep. Carolyn Maloney (NY); Rep. Jerrold Nadler (NY); Rep. Michael Honda (CA); Rep. Steve Cohen (TN); Rep. Phil Hare (IL); Rep. Grace Flores Napolitano (CA); Rep. Alcee Hastings (FL); Rep. James McGovern (MA); Rep. Marcy Kaptur (OH); Rep. Jan Schakowsky (IL); Rep. Julia Carson (IN); Rep. Linda Sanchez (CA); Rep. Raul Grijalva (AZ); Rep. John Olver (MA); Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (TX); Rep. Jim McDermott (WA); Rep. Ed Markey (MA); Rep. Chaka Fattah (PA); Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. (NJ); Rep. Rubin Hinojosa (TX); Rep. Pete Stark (CA); Rep. Bobby Scott (VA); Rep. Jim Moran (VA); Rep. Betty McCollum (MN); Rep. Jim Oberstar (MN); Rep. Diana DeGette (CO); Rep. Stephen Lynch (MA); Rep. Artur Davis (AL); Rep. Hank Johnson (GA); Rep. Donald Payne (NJ); Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (MO); Rep. John Lewis (GA); Rep. Yvette Clarke (NY); Rep. Neil Abercrombie (HI); Rep. Gwen Moore (WI); Rep. Keith Ellison (MN); Rep. Tammy Baldwin (WI); Rep. Donna Christensen (USVI); Rep. David Scott (GA); Rep. Luis Gutierrez (IL); Lois Capps (CA); Steve Rothman (NJ); Elijah Cummings (MD); and Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlackHawk706867 Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now thats a step in the right direction... Lets hope more sign onto
this. This could mushroom real quick when other Congress Critters get up to speed with this.

ww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. 69 Democrats and Ron Paul
Hardly bipartisan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
localroger Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Sure it is!
It's as bipartisan as anything pro-war signed on by 69 republicans and Joe Lieberman. What's good for the gooose and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. OUTSTANDING!!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I thought so, too! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Right there are 69 possible presidential/vice-presidential candidates. K&R
And, I hope there will be more to add to that list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. and Bush laughed heartily & took another bite of his toasted cheese sandwich .. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. LTR? A letter? .... a fucking letter? a letter. AAAAAAAAARG
Edited on Thu Jul-19-07 08:56 PM by lonestarnot
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Maybe all these folks would appease you if they signed on to
Kucinich's impeachment proposal? And I wonder why they all haven't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'm not looking for appeasement! I'm looking for saving my fucking country.
HR 333 is the only way to get that job done. I also wonder why they all haven't. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I was just trying to
lower your blood pressure - don't yell at me!:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. LOL. I'm sorry.
:hug: Nothing but IMPEACHMENT will lower my bloodpressure. ssssssssssssss!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ecellent! Now IMPEACH THE FUCKS!
That 'minority' of dedicated shrub supports and Middle East destroyers will bitch, but once their loved ones show up at home, they will become THANKER'S instead of HATERS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes! -- "...at the time you ordered the *invasion* in March, 2003 ...."
Edited on Thu Jul-19-07 08:57 PM by quiet.american
Finally, the word is in an official document and not just heard at protests. "War crime" is the phrase I'm still waiting hear uttered in an official capacity, but *invasion* instead of "Operation Iraqi Freedom" is still a very good step up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Woo Hoo way to go Tauscher
:yourock: I'm really warming up to you :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. it's a good start. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. It should be pointed out
That this is the core group that has always voted against Iraq funding, and most of whom vote against these massive, bloated "defense" bills. So it's hardly a revelation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. there should be at least 150 more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC