Boston Globe Editorial: "The World After George W. Bush"

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2007/07/22/the_world_after_george_w_bush/?p1=MEWell_Pos3

Globe Editorial
The world after George W. Bush
July 22, 2007

PRESIDENT BUSH has hinted more than once that he expects to leave to his successor the task of ending America's military occupation of Iraq. His reasons for doing so may go beyond calculations about the time needed to establish security and a functioning government in Iraq, beyond a reluctance to enter history as a president who presided over the retreat from a lost war. Perhaps Bush senses that the change of direction required to cut the nation's losses in Iraq would expose the flagrant misconceptions on which his conduct of the Iraq war was based.

If Bush were to accept the need to cut deals with Iran, Syria, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia as part of the price of containing the chaos in Iraq, he would be conceding that his grandiose notions of bestowing democracy on a key Arab country by force were delusional. Were a realistic exit strategy to be carried out on Bush's watch, it would become apparent -- while he was still in office -- that instead of implanting democracy in Iraq and conferring security on the oil-rich Gulf region, he has wrought almost the exact opposite.

A pattern of disasters

Bush called for a humble foreign policy as a candidate. But he and his advisers -- especially Vice President Dick Cheney -- believed from the start that America was so much stronger than all possible competitors that it need not be constrained from acting unilaterally whenever it saw the need. Bush has broken with predecessors of both parties, who sought security in strong alliances, support for the United Nations, diplomatic engagement with dangerous rivals, and respect for international treaties. And when deciding on fateful policies, Bush has often disdained to take into account the cultural and historical conditions specific to key countries.

In practice, that attitude has resulted in one calamity after another: the breakout of Iranian influence, unnecessary tensions with Russia, Bush's refusal to demand a quick halt to last summer's war between Israel and Hezbollah, US disavowal of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and the Kyoto protocol, and six years of declining to stem the tide of extremism by actively seeking to broker a peace accord between Israelis and Palestinians.

Clearly Iraq is Bush's greatest failure. Whether the many-sided conflicts raging there are the inevitable consequence of the US invasion or whether they stem from incoherent post-invasion policies, the result is the same: Sunni Arabs and Shi'ites are slaughtering each other. Al Qaeda in Iraq, an affiliate of Osama bin Laden's gang, is sending suicide bombers to blow up mosques and markets, police stations, and US vehicles. With jihadist partners, the group has declared an Islamic State of Iraq in the west of the country. Disparate Shi'ite militias, each with its own source of Iranian backing, are killing Sunnis and Americans and fighting each other for local dominance.

MORE

Literally, considering global warming.

The Middle East will do as it likes in the long run. Bush may have thought he could do it but he over reached. As the people want what others have they will find a way to get it. One sees this in most country even if we can not force it on them. The thoughts are out and people get the thoughts they can rule them self and it will not go back into the bottle. Try as they may the Churches will always follow what the people want if they want to keep the people in the Church. It is the same with the rulers or they will be gone. I do not think Bush went to Iraq to bring 'freedom' but for the oil but how he does use the 'freedom' thing as a battle cry. I hope we just step out and lets the Middle East fix their own problems. After all the terrorist are really killing their own people more than any one else. I am sure Bush will go back to Tx. and think he was right about every thing. Why change what he thinks now?

The bizarro bushworld view is Orwellian by nature. He says exactly the opposite of what he intends. Remember "Clear skies initiative"? Who really believes he had any intention of democratizing the middle east?

their power grab abuse to continue in perpetuity....They are playing for keeps!!