5. Frankly...maybe I'm strange here...but I thought Gravel, Richardson and Kucinich did the best!
Maybe I'm just so tired of campaign strategist answers...that sound like stuff I've heard from every Dem candidate for so many years that the rest are boring to me. All of them are good candidates. BUT...the same old political spin and careful answers made Gravel, Richardson and Kucinich stand out to this tired brain. :shrug:
14. Agreed, even though i don't agree with Richardson and Gravel
on some major issues Kucinich, Gravel, and Richardson by far did the best job mainly because they (gasp) answered the question they were asked and were honest about what they believed in. I can always respect that.
No kidding. Not even allowed to respond on healthcare. Should have been more assertive and insisted on time. The debate was a joke to promote Republican videos and promote Hillary.
Anyone really think this would be a fair representation and discussion of important issues?
to ensure the, shall we say, corporate-friendly candidates get the most face time. I mean, how the hell else will you know who to vote for if the media doesn't tell you who's "electable?"
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.