|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:20 PM Original message |
I'd like to drop a thought about Pelosi, Conyers and impeachment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meegbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
1. Can I get an Amen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philosophie_en_rose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
144. a-freaking-men! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. Will using logic, pragmatism and strategy is not appreciated by many here on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Ain't that the truth. Some of the best ideas are not feasible with a slim majority. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
124. Strategy with Bushco has worked so well, I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. What a great post. Thank you, thank you, thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debbierlus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
5. I respectfully disagree...& here is why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. Thank you debbierlus. I couldn't have said it better myself! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
24. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
164. Well, what other stuff is getting done? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 12:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
184. there is an indigenous people somewhere... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuckyLib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. Amen. I still have vision of sugarplums, er perp-walks dancing in my head, and I want to see those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
7. Politics. What can I say. For want of a nail... nf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azurnoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
8. Thank you!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
9. one question, Will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
27. I have sen it, but I don't need to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
151. So, let's see if we can't get links sent to all of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
10. Recs, please, everyone! Let's put this on the Greatest Page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
11. Nice name. Why didn't I think of that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. I believe Conyers is the one who can't count |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. What am I missing here? How many votes do we have in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
46. Less today than we WILL have once we start the hearings. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #21 |
56. And how hard is Conyers working to get those votes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:07 PM Response to Reply #56 |
65. And how would you know that. Last time I worked in a political |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #65 |
83. Well I believe that once they see the evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #65 |
119. Impeachment proceedings in the House typically start with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:02 PM Response to Reply #119 |
148. Impeachment start with a vote by the full House to authorize hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #148 |
187. Thanks for that clarification. If I read you correctly, then, Conyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. another amen here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:06 PM Response to Reply #23 |
64. I did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vanje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #23 |
102. Heres what I want Conyers and Pellosi to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:12 PM Response to Reply #102 |
130. Meanwhile... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vanje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #130 |
133. When Pelosi and Conyers start talkng about impeachment,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
43. I was always told "Don't count your chickens before they hatch." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #43 |
135. any political leader that doesn't count votes in advance is soon a former leader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. Any politician that just goes along with the crowd isn't a "leader." Not even close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #137 |
140. Darn fucking tootin! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 05:54 PM Response to Reply #137 |
147. when the "crowd" are the members of Congress whose votes are needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 05:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
145. "Reality is a bitch. Fantasy Land is much more fun." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
12. Troops are still dying... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
26. You didn't even read it, did you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Oh, I read it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:58 PM Original message |
How? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
59. How for which? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #59 |
78. Turn towards the light. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Which one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #79 |
105. The one always shining on you for such brave activism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
13. Stopping bushco trumps everything in my book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. But if stopping him puts the Rethugs back in power in 2008, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Why would stopping him put the republicans back in power? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Well obviously, I don't believe there is a snowball's chance in July of that happening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #20 |
40. And how do we run impeachment hearings if Bush continues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. You can't claim executive privilege in impeachment hearings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #45 |
67. I am going to have that tattooed on my forehead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:20 PM Response to Reply #45 |
161. Bush could still try to claim executive privilege |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
126. Based on what historical precedent? Jimmy Carter's 1976 victory? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #13 |
32. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #32 |
52. Will, have you seen this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
14. No mercy for you, Palm Frond! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
16. No flames..nice to see reasoned discussions. But please go to the link and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
22. Will I hate to agree with you. You make excellent points. BUT there comes a time when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #28 |
47. The AGAG hearings on Cspan3 today were a start. The closer to the election and the more BS that come |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtanarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
25. You make a good case... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #25 |
37. The "cons" did it in '98 'cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:52 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. I often wonder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #37 |
54. Indeed and they had already spent MILLIONS trying.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:55 PM Response to Reply #54 |
94. Yep, you're exactly right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:35 PM Response to Reply #54 |
162. The way the GOP got the White House back in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
91. The republic's whips had a bite to them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #91 |
97. Exactly, nothing would solidify their base more.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:16 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. that's exactly right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 01:21 AM Response to Reply #97 |
173. All thirty percent of them? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:17 PM Response to Reply #91 |
101. I call it "the FORCE" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:20 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. But you know Blue_Roses.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
29. Convict after 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #29 |
48. Yes, that's exactly what needs to be done... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenLeft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:14 PM Response to Reply #29 |
153. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
31. Yes, Will....what you say is a view....But, we remember when Daschle had a "plan" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
33. It won't do any good to move to Fiji |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
34. Excellent Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
35. You got a problem with Palm Fronds in Fiji? You have an issue with this..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mulsh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
36. Oh My God, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
38. You're living in a world of make-believe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #39 |
57. Proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:56 PM Response to Reply #38 |
51. You seem to be living in a world of the simple-minded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #51 |
61. Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:22 PM Response to Reply #61 |
77. You can't compare a blow-job with treason and bribery... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:41 PM Response to Reply #77 |
89. I understand the argument you are making. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #89 |
92. while I respect your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:06 PM Response to Reply #92 |
95. Out of curiosity, would there be any limits you would put on them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. The limits that I would put on them have much more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #95 |
107. That's just it, it doesn't matter what limits we put on them.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #107 |
118. I think Watergate is very instructive on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 08:39 AM Response to Reply #118 |
179. How do you figure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #89 |
109. You don't understand that impeachment won't "get rid" of Bush/Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:47 PM Response to Reply #109 |
121. Cheney would be convicted, without any doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #77 |
166. How do you help people when Bush vetoes everything? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #51 |
69. Clinton never had a 71% disapproval rating. By contrast, those who vote to acquit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #69 |
98. Nobody has ever said Bush would get a pass...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #98 |
104. Well that's sort of the definition of the phrase, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #104 |
115. No, I don't think so.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #115 |
123. If the only Constitutional method to stop them is impeachment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #115 |
141. The way you describe is using it as a partisan tool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 08:37 AM Response to Reply #141 |
178. If the Republicans won't support it, then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:22 PM Response to Reply #98 |
106. How is Bush NOT getting a pass? How is he to be held accountable for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:26 PM Response to Reply #106 |
110. How was Nixon ever held accountable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #110 |
113. Everyone knows Nixon resigned in disgrace. Nixon knew it, too; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #69 |
111. Less than half of the public wants him impeached now, whether they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #111 |
116. BARELY less than half. This is not the overwhelming rejection that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #111 |
142. But even less than that oppose him being impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:26 PM Response to Reply #51 |
80. Clinton was a good president, who was unjustly impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #51 |
127. 1974. Check it out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 01:30 AM Response to Reply #51 |
174. You just gave me a thought though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
41. I usually agree with you Will, but not this time.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
44. Hi Palm Frond, didnt you know reason was banned from here 3 months ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RFKJr4PRES (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
49. Conyers LIED to all of US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:57 PM Response to Reply #49 |
165. Conyers isn't dishonest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
50. I said pretty much the same thing here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
53. And so the options are? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
55. I get it ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
58. Look -- this is the equivalent of WATERGATE . .. PLUS . . . Why wouldn't we have impeachment -- ???! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:05 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. According to John Dean....and some of us who were around then...Worse than Watergate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:40 PM Response to Reply #63 |
88. Where's our John Dean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
60. What will cause the most damage to the Republican Party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #60 |
76. What will cause the most damage to our Constitution, nation, our soldiers -- Iraq -- our Treasury? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #76 |
86. You'd just be replacing these maniacs with more maniacs.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poiuyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
62. If what you're saying is true, then we might as well remove Impeachment from the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #62 |
72. At if we are ignored...we make our voices heard at the ballot box. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mentalsolstice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
66. Finally, some realism! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:19 PM Response to Reply #66 |
75. Why is it not possible for the majority in the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mentalsolstice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #75 |
81. 1 + 1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #81 |
114. You did not answer my question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vanje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #114 |
120. We dont have the votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #120 |
129. I'm with you. That's why I'm still waiting on the answer to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mentalsolstice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:21 PM Response to Reply #129 |
156. Nobody is telling you to shut up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
68. We have to try and get what we want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Yes, but we have to know the dif between getting a burger our way in 60 seconds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. If you don't move the roadblocks quick enough, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #71 |
82. It still takes the manpower, and they don't have the numbers yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. Since we have a pretty big advantage in the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #85 |
131. What majority? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 10:01 PM Response to Reply #85 |
171. The work in the House is not gonna get bush/cheney removed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dollface (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
73. John Conyers is a good man. Let's help him move to impeachment proceedings by raising hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
74. Stop posting shit I agree with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DinahMoeHum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
84. Agreed, Will. Folks, we can't play allies like enemies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
87. I respect your work a lot, Mr. Pitt. However, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greatauntoftriplets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
90. You right-wing troll!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:19 PM Response to Reply #90 |
155. I was called |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greatauntoftriplets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:59 PM Response to Reply #155 |
157. That is so wrong on so many levels.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #157 |
159. I was terrible... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greatauntoftriplets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 09:15 PM Response to Reply #159 |
168. It appears that way..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyesroll (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #159 |
169. I prefer to think his being a Senator is why he's not moving to impeach RIGHT FUCKING NOW (or ever). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
93. I disagree, and here's why... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 09:09 PM Response to Reply #93 |
167. I don't agree with Dean about executive privilege |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:52 AM Response to Reply #167 |
182. It's not a matter of agreeing or disagreeing with Dean... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grandrose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
96. Thank You....Brilliant post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
108. Baloney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
112. Yo, Palm Frond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
117. What's this about not retreating? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
122. Nixon had won in a landslide. I wonder how the Congressional Republicans found their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
125. Disagree with you about Feingold... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
128. Logic is good and so is pragmatism, but this is our country we are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
132. I thought reason and logic aren't allowed here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapislzi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
134. Oh, I think this is called POLITICS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
136. You can always become one of the 'Mole People' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
138. What happened to your Stalingrad moment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #138 |
143. "Sir, I knew Josef Stalin, and you are no Stalin" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malikshah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
139. "Drop a thought"? What an unfortunate choice of wording. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
146. Conyers will impeach, but not TODAY, and that WAS the outrageous demand by some as of late. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:14 PM Response to Reply #146 |
152. time is running out for Conyers and the rest of Congress . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:16 PM Response to Reply #152 |
154. Indeed, time is running out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
149. Thank You Will....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenLeft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
150. thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bread_and_roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
158. Ray McGovern on John Conyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 02:25 AM Response to Reply #158 |
175. AGREED. Also, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #158 |
185. agree with your post and above response. will pitt... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
160. Will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
163. Good points, Will. Good points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
170. Hey Will, These Things You Speak Of: (jobs, pay, health, environment, jobs, he's from Detroit, jobs) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
172. Good points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 04:05 AM Response to Original message |
176. Why, Will, are you confusing these poor hysterics with reason and reality? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
177. K & R. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
180. I love the accessible Will Pitt on this thread, and on the flurry of threads produced yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Time for change (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
181. This doesn't fully compute for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #181 |
186. sorry, time for change, but will pitt ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mimitabby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
183. thanks for taking the time to answer my question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC