Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gonzales: the decision to prosecute Miers would be made by Solicitor General

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:00 PM
Original message
Gonzales: the decision to prosecute Miers would be made by Solicitor General
It was at the end of the opening statements. Leahy asked if Gonzales would block the D.C. U.S. Attorney from prosecuting those who refuse to testify before Congress. Gonzales said that he was recused from that investigation. Leahy asked who would decide whether the prosecution would be blocked or could proceed. Gonzales said the Solicitor General would make that decision.

That is news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. technically....
...it would be the referral to a grand jury that is either blocked or allowed by the Solicitor General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. thats in the Constitution
and the Solicitor General better do his job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It would be this guy


More info here:
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1073944820670

Legal career from wiki

Following graduation, Clement clerked for Judge Laurence H. Silberman of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and for Associate Justice Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Supreme Court. After his clerkships, he worked as an associate in the Washington, D.C., office of Kirkland & Ellis. Clement went on to serve as Chief Counsel of Subcommittee on the Constitution, Federalism and Property Rights of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. Afterwards, he was a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of King & Spalding, where he headed the firm's appellate practice. Mr. Clement also served from 1998 to 2004 as an Adjunct Professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, where he taught a seminar on the separation of powers.

Clement joined the United States Department of Justice in February 2001. Before his confirmation as Solicitor General, he served as Acting Solicitor General for nearly a year and as Principal Deputy Solicitor General. He has argued over 25 cases before the United States Supreme Court, including McConnell v. FEC, Tennessee v. Lane, Rumsfeld v. Padilla, United States v. Booker, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld v. FAIR, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, Gonzales v. Raich, Gonzales v. Oregon and Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation. He also argued many of the key cases in the lower courts involving challenges to the President's conduct of the war on terrorism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_D._Clement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. another fixer
great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Wonder who it goes to when he has to recuse himself....guess we'd better WIKI
Edited on Tue Jul-24-07 03:18 PM by KoKo01
for the Assistant Solicitor General.... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. This is a well thought out attack of our constitution. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. INHERENT CONTEMPT
that is what these guys need to use
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Agree....Inherent Contempt is about all we have left that wouldn't be
corrupted...but then who knows what little legal traps lie in that one, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. IMHO, the only way to go is
Inherent contempt. Drag these criminals before the congress, and throw their sorry butts in jail. I can't believe this......obstruction is the least of it. A bunch of fascist criminals and their puppet are occupying the White House, and there's no way to get the maniacs out?

So much for democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. was the Solicitor General installed by recess appointment??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Normal Contempt charges are meaningless now.
They would bounce around the Courts for over a year and may even get thrown out.Inherent Contempt is the only effective path now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC