|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:05 PM Original message |
Why isn't Cindy Sheehan protesting members of the GOP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. THAT'S A FUCKIN GOOD QUESTION! anyone know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
45. Yeah, actually I know exactly why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #45 |
52. But she can appeal to the people who vote for GOP members |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #52 |
84. The only GOP voters left are the sheep who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jarnocan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #45 |
74. true- she is OF COURSE anti-BU**SH**repugs- but trying to find those who give a ..nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salinen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:20 PM Response to Reply #45 |
77. Imagine Cindy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speakclearly (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #45 |
88. Actually, that's no quite true........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
53. That has already been answered many, many times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. You just made my point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #57 |
70. All the anti-war activists are pleading with the Dems and Rethugs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #70 |
94. And the pressure needs to be properly applied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:07 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. Protests are messy, just as war is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
81. Sure. It's not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pschoeb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
102. She just did, on July 18 at Howard Coble's office in North Carolina |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. Facts don't matter! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why aren't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Who says I'm not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. So when were Pelosi and Conyers part of the GOP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
33. Is this thread protesting the GOP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #33 |
47. Nice strawman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. I asked, too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. Indeed. They'd sure be eager to have her support and her vote. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. It's not that she has her vote to offer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. It would bring more effective attention to the issue. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
9. Bet you it's because Dems might be swayed and Reps won't be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Except she's hurting the side that would help her most |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. how are the republicans blocking a vote for impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. bring bushes crimes out into the open and paint anybody who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. I don't want to just do that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I want to not only get bush and the cabal out of office but destroy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:36 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. They're already destroying themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
75. The problem is: we are not going to get a shot under the present paradigm n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #75 |
79. then I stand by my view of funeral time for democracy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:46 PM Response to Reply #79 |
89. Christ, using impeachment to destroy a political party, that's democracy then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #89 |
96. so you are saying that the republicans should continue to exist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salinen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
85. Is she hurting the anti-war cause? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Thanks for saving me the typing time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Apply pressure to where it will have a point of being there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. once again the republicans aren't the ones that took impeachment off the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. But they can block conviction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I figure they have to at least make the attempt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. I fear moving without certainty of success will make things worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. and if we don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. So if we impeach and fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:37 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. but if we don't impeach I have no doubt that will happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. How would that work out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. I am saying that the only answer is to impeach and win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Then we'll need help from the Republicans.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. I have no doubt that once the evidence of their crimes and plans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Would have to be pretty damning evidence indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
60. My view is that if they stand with him they will fall with him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #43 |
63. What? They're going to start doing the RIGHT THING? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:05 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. that might happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #67 |
76. They will stand together and MAYBE the public will get the real message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. Then we must make them get the message. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #78 |
91. And how do we "take over all the media temporarily?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:05 PM Response to Reply #91 |
97. if there needs to be armed insurrection then that needs to be done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #97 |
107. Should that time ever come, I'll be standing at the barricades. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #107 |
111. at what point will it be called for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
58. It's like the mafia boss who goes to trial and beats the rap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #58 |
64. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #58 |
65. If that is the case everybody who still cares should go to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #27 |
39. Even if impeachment succeeds.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:47 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. impeach both at once. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 08:35 AM Response to Reply #41 |
106. I'll have to check.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salinen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #15 |
86. So Conyers will become so annoyed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salinen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
82. Well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
21. There's no cheap publicity in that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
25. Quoting Myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:37 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. But the Dems she's going after are the ones who would be on her side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. Man, don't bother. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
34. She really needs to be camped outside of Mitch McConnell's office! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
35. Why aren't liberals protesting against Kim Jong Il? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #35 |
48. False analogy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. You really think we can get Republicans to impeach? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:05 PM Response to Reply #59 |
68. I think it is likely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #68 |
73. The wrath of their constituents is exactly why they WON'T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:13 PM Response to Reply #73 |
95. Which poll shows that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:31 PM Response to Reply #95 |
101. This one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
judaspriestess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
36. Maybe this is the only way she can get attention to her cause? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #36 |
49. Its counterproductive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
37. Because the responsibility resides with the Majority Party. Thats us.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. But we don't have all the power we need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. The battlecry of the perpetual loser. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Red herring and ad hominem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Whining about not having enough of a majority won't win any votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. So going after the people who are already going to vote for you does? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #61 |
72. how about going after both parties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #51 |
71. Given that the objective requires a SUPERMAJORITY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salinen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #51 |
87. And there's no guarantee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
50. the majority, not the minority, controls the legislative agenda in the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. They've been blocked by the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #55 |
62. that has Zero to do with anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. How is that so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #66 |
93. "evidence"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 01:34 PM Response to Reply #93 |
108. If we had 60 Democrat Senators, we'd be pulling out of Iraq already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
69. They never promised her a Rose Garden (as it were). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelgb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
80. are you serious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
83. Because it is more effective to try to change the actions of those... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #83 |
90. The Impeachment of Cheney would force him to bring forth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. If there is good reason for impeachment and the republicans all vote against it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
99. In the fight to impeach, Impeachophobic Dems are the Opposition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
100. I seem to remember her camping outside Bush's ranch, have you forgotten? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
104. I think it may be because she it too busy eating babies and puppies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInAnomie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
105. Because she's Mrs. Ron Paul. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puregonzo1188 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
109. I believe she did protest members of the GOP it wasn't until after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
110. because TRUE progressives rip on Democrats. Duh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC