|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:01 AM Original message |
*** Official House Judiciary Contempt Hearing Thread #3 *** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
1. Conyers started correcting Cannon's LIES just in time for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. treasonous piece of shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sweet Freedom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:11 AM Response to Reply #8 |
38. Stupid treasonous piece of shit :) /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
2. Conyers taking about the parlimentarian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
3. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
4. I stepped away - did Conyers call him on the "Imperial status" remark for the President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Yes, he did. Made Cannon 'clarify' his statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #12 |
25. did cannon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:31 AM Response to Reply #25 |
137. Yes but I don't remember what he said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Not yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #18 |
33. Yes! It obviously won't be in the M$M |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Original message |
He said B* had "Imperial status"?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
5. Conyers....trying to explain to Repugs what this is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
6. Conyers sounds like he's explaining something to a dense child. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. and the Repukes will still not get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. You can not pour tea into a full cup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #6 |
15. no, I would not insult a child by comparing to Cannon---Cannon is a Bush loyalist to the tee!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. yes, he is sure explaining alot to these repigs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
43. "You cannot wake someone who is PRETENDING to be asleep." nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
7. we are voting on the narrow issue of the refusal to comply to the subpeona |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
9. Exactly, the hearing is about the contempt citations..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
10. Conyers said that this contempt deals only with not complying with subpeonas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
13. Geeeeeeez, I just looked up the bio of Chris Asshole Cannon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #13 |
21. He's doing his best "crooked lawyer" schtick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #13 |
24. All the members of the JC are lawyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #24 |
44. Thanks for the info.....I should have realized that! LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #13 |
27. like the WH, he pushes the legal envelope-----to the point that is it has lots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
17. OMG. It's Wednesday!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Ding Ding Ding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
20. Ah shit! It sounds like it's NOT going to be INHERENT CONTEMPT! Cannon just mentioned "losing in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #20 |
31. how do you know thats not next??? Congress is a slow process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lynnertic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:11 AM Response to Reply #20 |
37. maybe to call W.H. bluff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:11 AM Response to Reply #20 |
39. maybe conyers is going to use "inherent contempt" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ramapo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:15 AM Response to Reply #39 |
54. I don't think they have the stones for inherent contempt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
23. Well, Conyers schooled them properly! Plus, having a ton of verbiage to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
26. heehee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
28. oh god another repig. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
29. "Loaves of bread?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
30. Is this The House of Representatives or a flashback to something like The Weimar Republic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
32. Conyers: "Your mic isnt working, we might have to have that investigated" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
34. Sanchez up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
35. Hello, hello, hello ~~ Repuke idiots on the House Judic Committee: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Reply #35 |
57. Yes, they're all lawyers...all paid-for attorneys for the defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
36. Sanchez--McNolte's views are OPIN--not FACTS (she knows her case) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:12 AM Response to Reply #36 |
42. she is refutting soem of the 'facts" from Cannon amendment. Whow--listen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
40. Sanchez gives the other evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
41. Sanchez refuting Loose Cannon's cherrypicking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
45. he's rude isn't he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
46. I've identified the fart sound |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:15 AM Response to Reply #46 |
51. No, I'm pretty sure that was Cannon speaking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Reply #51 |
59. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
47. we are here seeking additional information to clear up this investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
48. Please, Conyers, make Cannon stop butting in! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
49. The Silence Of Tex... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
50. TEX Sensenbrenner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Original message |
hes from Wisconsin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Original message |
Sez this is a needless escallation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ralps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:17 AM Original message |
Gack!! Senselessbrenner!! I hope We'll get to kick him out of the Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A wise Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
52. Cannon is there to disrupt the hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #52 |
94. He's obstructing justice, just like Meyers. Shame. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
53. CUT HIS MIC OFF!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Reply #53 |
58. I second that motion!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:17 AM Response to Reply #53 |
69. Yes!!! I have heard ENOUGH from his big mouth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
desi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:17 AM Response to Reply #53 |
70. One thing he can not do today.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #70 |
82. thank goodness, sensenbrenner has no love for conyers either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
55. Sensenbrenner - EWWWW! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Original message |
I bet his breath smells like bratwurst |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
56. Rove's name comes up...sure to cause a shiver down GOP spines... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
60. How novel that Sensenbrenner is concerned about Congressional oversight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
61. sensenbrenner what a arrogant man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
62. Senslessbrenner- Ah, let's all just go home. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #62 |
75. Senselessbrenner, hahahahahaha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
63. Stensenbrenner is up--SUPPORTS the amendment.--says 'needless escalazion" by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #63 |
72. But he's talking about inherent contempt being needless escalation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
64. Saleh Kamel's Wisconsin asset:Sensenbrenner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #64 |
76. ah KOTEX MAN from ----the GREAT STATE of WISCONSIN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
65. Umm, who provoked the Constitutional crisis, Herr Senselessbrenner? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #65 |
71. thank god, these clowns do not have the majority anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
66. THIS IS ABOUT OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
67. Look It's Mr Potato Head! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
68. No, please, non Sensenbrenner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
73. Let me see if I have this right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #73 |
83. I've gotten computer-generated SPAM that made more sense. Just more irrelevant BS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #73 |
100. Ah, yes...you see "their" is the Cons. Actually, the Cons argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
74. OH FUCK YOU SENSENBRENNER! just STFU you dishonest sack of gas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
77. "The Majority, who have the votes to pass it...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:19 AM Original message |
Is Sensenbrenner saying the Court is fixed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A wise Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
78. Let's make this simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
79. "two branches of government.." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
80. Well he's right. It's partisan clashing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
81. Senselessbringer "thinks the WH would win"...Gosh! Is that because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #81 |
86. sensenbrenner is on the dark side too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #81 |
88. yes, even Dem scholars are saying that. That is why it would be best to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:26 AM Original message |
Fully agree! But they also have to test the recent order from Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
84. I'm Late To The Party, Can Someone Please Help Me Out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #84 |
97. What to do -wheat avenue to take is the nextt step---This is just about bringing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #97 |
105. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #84 |
104. No. It sounds like it's going to the D.C. U.S. attorney. We all know that's going NOWHERE, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
85. Wish we could shut off your mike and shut off the lights just for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #85 |
121. LOL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mulsh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
87. take it to the DC District Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
89. Woo hoo Schiff!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
90. NO LEGAL SUPPORT FOR THAT WHATSOEVER! And that's what this is about, morans! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
91. Schiff is talking now, sound talking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
92. Right on, Rep Schiff! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #92 |
98. Woo hooo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
93. Schiff is awesome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #93 |
102. I'm liking this a lot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:26 AM Response to Reply #93 |
112. yup, for them perhaps but for us, I don't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #112 |
120. oh here we go again Clinton "Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
95. Here's what Senselessbrenner said about impeaching Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
96. What they're talking about here also applies to impeachments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
99. This guy Schiff is doing great. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:26 AM Response to Reply #99 |
107. Amen, Mr. Schiff!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #107 |
119. Asshole now, saying "Democrat President." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A wise Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
101. Adam Schif is trying to explain common sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
103. Really this is an easy one .... no question regarding contempt for not showing up under subpoena |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
106. SCHIFF: "Contempuous refusal to appear" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
108. Than "Democrat" presidents? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
109. Schiff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
110. He's not my President-he only occupies the office he stole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
111. Shiff's comments are extremely critical. Pivotal discussion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
113. Blame the Clenis time!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #113 |
125. Clinton claimed EP many times more than Shrub????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #125 |
131. Even if true, Bush still has several months to catch and surpass him. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
114. CLINTON, CLINTON, CLINTON.......STFU, Keller! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
115. BUT DID THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION EVER IGNORE SUBPOENAS?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
116. OH no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
117. Ric Keller: And again, Clinton is worse than *, always has been. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Original message |
Clinton again. Thanks, Keller. Have a hot dog and STFU... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
133. boy these guys hate clinton don't they? that is why that wanted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
118. Keller- Clinton did it too! But that is a lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
122. Please, someone, shoot down the "Clinton did it" talking points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #122 |
127. Clinton DIDN'T ignore subpoenas! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #127 |
138. Well that is exactly my point!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
123. THREAD 4 HERE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
124. Oh fer fuckssake- Keller's back to the "Clinton" mantra. I'm out of here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
126. Keller...CLINTON! CLINTON! CLINTON!!! WHY don't the DEMS start throwing REAGAN AND NIXON in their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:30 AM Response to Reply #126 |
134. What a repuke idiot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
128. KELLER: Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
129. Keller(R-Florida) may be watching his career come to an end.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
130. The talking point is "No evidence." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
132. who is the whiny fat ass? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
135. *** House Judiciary Contempt Hearing Thread 4 *** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
136. Who do these republicans think they're dupping! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 10th 2024, 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC