|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:38 PM Original message |
DOJ Letter To House Judiciary: Even If You Pass Contempt Charges-We Will IGNORE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. Another thumbing of the nose and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soothsayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. the rule of lawlessness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. It is getting close to.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A wise Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. It has always been that close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. Well, just wait 40 days, and we'll see about that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
5. Pathetic - Just Political Theatre....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
6. Legal means don't seem to work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muntrv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
8. Ah the ole' Clinton-did-it-too-line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Cleaner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
9. HOLY SCHNIKIES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
10. the arrogance is astounding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. That "arrogance" was witnessed in the last days of The Weimar Republic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Cleaner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
11. Second thought - but wait a minute - Clinton was IMPEACHED dammit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
12. Pass 'em anyways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
13. Sergeant at Arms--Paging Sergeant at Arms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. How does inherent contempt fit ito this scenario? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 06:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I thought that if this one last final attempt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pachamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
16. I used to think that the Justice Dept. served the law and the people.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
17. HOW IN THE HECK can they ignore inherent contempt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 06:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. They are not charging INHERENT contempt.. at least, not yet. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:15 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. I think Cheney and Addington are front and center on this one. (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:23 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. While simultaneously lurking in the shadows.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
20. So they had this letter in hand, and decided to vote for the conventional statutory contempt charge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
21. ok, now tell me again why impeachment is off the table? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
22. I didn't think they would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
23. This is truly the announcement of an Executive Branch claiming Ultimate Power over 2 other Branches |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
24. More outrage n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
25. Hence, a prosecutor outside the DOG, uh, DOG, uh, DOJ, must be appointed OR,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
26. Congress should turn to its "inherent contempt" power, last used in 1934, which entails ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
27. Another duh moment if anybody thought otherwise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
28. This Thread needs some K & R !!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 09:23 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. This is evidence that the DOJ will not uphold the Constitution....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
31. The junta is in full operational mode... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC