Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU Demands Answers from FBI Chief on abuse of National Security Letters (NSLs)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:23 AM
Original message
ACLU Demands Answers from FBI Chief on abuse of National Security Letters (NSLs)
ACLU Demands Answers from FBI Chief
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - Washington, DC (7/26/2007)
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nationalsecurityletters/31055prs20070726.html


Today, the American Civil Liberties Union strongly urged the House Judiciary Committee to hold the FBI accountable for its abuse of National Security Letters (NSLs) and its role in warrantless wiretapping. After passage of the Patriot Act, the NSL power was broadly expanded and broadly abused, according to a report issued by the FBI’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG). This will be the first congressional appearance of Director Robert Mueller since former Assistant Attorney General James Comey revealed Mueller’s unease with the National Security Agency’s wiretapping program during his testimony before the Senate in May.

"Frankly, the FBI has a lot of explaining to do," said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. "From the rampant abuse of NSLs to the murky negotiations with the administration over domestic spying, there are far too many unanswered questions. The FBI is supposed to be enforcing the law, not trying to get around it."

The ACLU has challenged both the NSL statute and the NSA program. In both cases, the district courts ruled in the ACLU’s favor. However, in the NSA case, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to rule on the legality of the program, saying that the ACLU’s clients - criminal defense lawyers, journalists, scholars and non-profit organizations - could not prove with certainty they had been spied on. In the ACLU's challenge to the NSL gag rule, the district court ruled the gag unconstitutional. Congress amended the law in 2006, fixing some problems with the statute but makes the "gag" provision even more oppressive. The ACLU challenged the amended gag law; arguments are scheduled for August 15 in the Southern District of New York.

On the legislative front, Representatives Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Jeff Flake (R-AZ) introduced a bill today that would make several changes to the existing NSL statute, which allows FBI agents to demand phone, computer and bank records without judicial review. The bill includes a proposal to fix the gag rule and mandates reports to Congress on their use. The bill would also limit the use of NSLs to those directly connected to a terrorism investigation, thereby preventing the fishing expeditions that became public in the OIG’s report.

"The NSL statute is in desperate need of repair," added Fredrickson. "It is clear that the executive branch has run amok, and clearly, both legislative and judicial intervention must occur to realign our system of checks and balances. Congress must pass the National Security Letters Reform Act of 2007 as quickly and assuredly as it passed the Patriot Act."

For more information go to:
www.reformthepatriotact.org

To read more about the ACLU’s work on NSLs, go to:
www.aclu.org/nsl

=========================

DU Archive: Conyers: New FBI Report Confirms "Worst Fears" on FBI abuse of NSLs
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1123651
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Letter requesting Extensive Information about NSA Terrorist Surveillance Program
Letter requesting Extensive Information about NSA Terrorist Surveillance Program

02-08-2006 -- Judiciary Committee Oversight Letter to Attorney General Gonzales
requesting Extensive Information about NSA Terrorist Surveillance Program.
http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/DOJNSA.pdf
LARGE FILE WARNING = 14 page PDF


Dear Attorney General Gonzales:

As you are aware, on December 16,2005, the New York Times reported that the President
ordered the National Security Agency (NSA) to conduct warrantless wiretaps on international
communications between suspected terrorists and individuals within the United States. On
December 17,2005, the President addressed the Nation in his weekly radio address and
responded to the New York times article. President Bush explained that "To fight the war on
terror, I am using authority vested in me by Congress, including the Joint Authorization for Use
of Military Force, which passed overwhelmingly in the first week after September the 11th I'm
also using constitutional authority vested in me as Commander-in-Chief." He highlighted the
fact that this program is continuously reviewed. "The activities authorized are reviewed
approximately every 45 days. Each review is based on a fresh intelligence assessment of terrorist
threats to the continuity of our government and the threat of catastrophic damage to our
homeland. During each assessment, previous activities under the authorization are reviewed.
The review includes approval by our nation's top legal officials, including the Attorney General
and the Counsel to the President."

The Committee on the Judiciary has received two referrals of resolutions of inquiry
regarding the Department of Justice's involvement in the NSA program. ......

............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC